coreboot VS Windows 10 IoT

BIOS replacement: Https://coreboot.org - T440p, X131e, X1C1, and xx30 series (no 61) or older Https://libreboot.org - similar to coreboot as of 20221214 release. Source: over 1 year ago

All of that code is also in the upstream coreboot.org sources, although these sources are less-well tested, generally speaking. Tested binaries (including a tested "more regular" payload like SeaBIOS or Tianocore instead of Chrome OS' "depthcharge" payload) based on that code can be obtained at https://mrchromebox.tech/. Source: over 2 years ago

Coreboot is great if you would like to enjoy working with the BIOS. https://coreboot.org/ r/coreboot. Source: over 2 years ago

Support guys like this: Https://system76.com/ & https://coreboot.org/ that do their best to remove everything proprietary at as low level as possible for Intel and AMD. You can also hack some older thinkpads that I think completely disable IME. Source: almost 3 years ago

If it is a mac, buy a similarly spec'd non-apple laptop, install coreboot, and then copy over your old drive's user data. https://coreboot.org. Source: about 3 years ago

I would assume that Microsoft has some presence in these kinds of spaces as well (https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot/), but I find that there is a fairly low barrier to entry as far as learning how to manipulate linux well enough to build this type of functionality yourself. Or you can just as easily use the same knowledge to setup your desktop how you like it or whatever. They're the same thing... Source: about 2 years ago

It does, but Microsoft doesn't consider that to be a "home user" use-case. Instead, in their minds, it's a use-case exclusively of interest to embedded-device system integrators: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I originally stumbled across what looks like a silver bullet device for caller ID, the Artech AD102. This is a HID device though, not serial like a USB modem and requires DLLs to use. The node-hid package looked a plausible candidate here, but it became rapidly clear that the AD102 must be switched into a kind of "open for questions" mode to get responses out of it, mandating use of the DLLs. Those DLLs are only... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago