Coq VS Typescript

Coq Reviews

Typescript Reviews

Coq mentions (46)

• The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation

  Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong

  Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?

  Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago

• Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8

  Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: 12 months ago

• Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs

  This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

Typescript mentions (25)

• Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application

  Vitest supports ECMAScript modules (ESM), TypeScript out of the box. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• 🎓 Monorepo College Lecture 2: Build Me Up Buttercup

  In this part, we will be initializing the project, getting all of the initial files out of the way and then configure Prettier as well as create the first package of our monorepo which will be a tsconfig package responsible for sharing TypeScript configuration files to the other packages we will create in the future. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• When type can be null or an array

  The owners of TypeScript need to do a better job at documenting language features. I always know that some sort of null/undefined handling is available but can never remember the name of the operators. And when you browse or search typescriptlang.org you cannot even find any docs on null forgiving operators. They spend more time detailing how JSX works than they do the basics of the language. Source: over 1 year ago

• The T3 Stack

  The core pieces are Next.js and TypeScript. Tailwind CSS is almost always included. If you’re doing anything resembling backend, tRPC, Prisma, and NextAuth.js are great additions too. Source: over 1 year ago

• Is it just me that feels this way?

  Good thing there's this project that adds types to javascript, and the fact that Python already has a way to add types to functions and has a program to check them. Source: over 1 year ago