Software Alternatives & Reviews

Converse.JS VS Qiscus

Compare Converse.JS VS Qiscus and see what are their differences

Converse.JS logo Converse.JS

A free and open-source chat client for your website

Qiscus logo Qiscus

Engage your customers from your own apps and mainstream chat apps like Whatsapp, LINE, Facebook Messenger, Telegram, Email, Twitter, Instagram, etc. and centralize all chats into a single dashboard.
  • Converse.JS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • Qiscus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03

Converse.JS videos

Real-Time Chat on the Web How to use XMPP and Converse.js to integrate webchat into any website

Qiscus videos

Qiscus TechTalk #91: Growth Hacking

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Converse.JS and Qiscus)
Customer Support
100 100%
0% 0
Communication
54 54%
46% 46
Group Chat & Notifications
Help Desk
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Converse.JS and Qiscus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Converse.JS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Converse.JS mentions (9)

  • An actually private messaging self hosted server
    I agree. IMHO the best variant is then to use something that is truely free. Like XMPP. There are a lot of servers and many clients to chose from and I can strongly recommend converse.js as a web client. It supports different ways of end to end encryption but I would recommend OMEMO which is basically the same encryption idea that you find in Signal. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Xmpp Bot with its own address.
    Hello, I recently started exploring xmpp, with snikket app and conversejs.org. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Matrix was worth the effort to self host.
    It is Converse.js (https://conversejs.org/) packaged into a one-click install for openfire (from the web admin). So, one-click install for an xmpp web client. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What is your recommended stack for real time chat?
    My choice, because it's the stack I know very well, would be Prosody ( https://prosody.im/ - I'm one of the devs) and a web client such as Converse.js ( https://conversejs.org/ ). XMPP is highly extensible, Prosody is highly modular, which make them a good foundation for building on top of. That said, the right stack is generally the one that matches your requirements, and (if this isn't primarily a learning... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • No white list registering with conversejs.org
    Tried to register with conversejs.org today and got an error "your IP is not whitelisted". Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Qiscus mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Qiscus yet. Tracking of Qiscus recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Converse.JS and Qiscus, you can also consider the following products

tawk.to - tawk.to is a free live chat app that lets you monitor and chat with visitors on your website or from a free customizable page

TapTalk.io - TapTalk.io is a complete in-app chat SDK and messaging API - Easy integration and customizeable.

Rocket.Chat - Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework.

Lets Chat - Open source self-hosted chat app for small teams

WeChat API - WeChat API and SDK allow developers to access and integrate the functionality of WeChat with other applications.

Userlike - Userlike is free live chat software for website and mobile support.