Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Control-M VS webMethods ActiveTransfer

Compare Control-M VS webMethods ActiveTransfer and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

webMethods ActiveTransfer logo webMethods ActiveTransfer

Eliminate extra hardware, EDI software licenses and maintenance fees Consolidate your transactions on webMethods Trading Networks, a scalable, easy-to-manage B2B gateway.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • webMethods ActiveTransfer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-22

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

webMethods ActiveTransfer videos

No webMethods ActiveTransfer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and webMethods ActiveTransfer)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
File Transfer
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and webMethods ActiveTransfer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and webMethods ActiveTransfer

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

webMethods ActiveTransfer Reviews

We have no reviews of webMethods ActiveTransfer yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and webMethods ActiveTransfer, you can also consider the following products

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

RSSBus Connect - RSSBus offers API-driven secure data integration solution.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

OpenText Alloy - OpenText Alloy enables companies to modernize their integration operations to successfully tackle digital transformation.