Software Alternatives & Reviews

Control-M VS Traverse Monitoring

Compare Control-M VS Traverse Monitoring and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Traverse Monitoring logo Traverse Monitoring

Traverse Monitoring is an IT Management software that provides businesses with a network monitoring solution which is capable of handling the tasks of monitoring private clouds, distributed network infestation and virtualized infrastructure.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Traverse Monitoring Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Traverse Monitoring videos

No Traverse Monitoring videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and Traverse Monitoring)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
50 50%
50% 50
Backup & Restore
0 0%
100% 100
Workflow Automation
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and Traverse Monitoring. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and Traverse Monitoring

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Traverse Monitoring Reviews

We have no reviews of Traverse Monitoring yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and Traverse Monitoring, you can also consider the following products

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Float - The leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. With a simple, drag and drop interface and powerful editing tools, Float saves you time and keeps projects on track.