Software Alternatives & Reviews

Control-M VS Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery

Compare Control-M VS Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery logo Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery

Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery is another IT Management and file recovery tool that can successfully restore and recover all the deleted items, attachment, task, and contacts etc.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-24

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery videos

Client Review & Testimonial - Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery

More videos:

  • Review - Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery | Simple Drag & Drop | Recommended

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
52 52%
48% 48
Backup & Restore
0 0%
100% 100
Workflow Automation
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery Reviews

We have no reviews of Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and Kernel for Exchange Server Recovery, you can also consider the following products

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Traverse Monitoring - Traverse Monitoring is an IT Management software that provides businesses with a network monitoring solution which is capable of handling the tasks of monitoring private clouds, distributed network infestation and virtualized infrastructure.