Software Alternatives & Reviews

Control-M VS ActiveBatch

Compare Control-M VS ActiveBatch and see what are their differences

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

ActiveBatch logo ActiveBatch

Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12
  • ActiveBatch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-12-04

Orchestrate your entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation and Enterprise Job Scheduling. Build and centralize end-to-end workflows under a single pane of glass. Seamlessly manage systems, applications, and services across your organization. Eliminate manual workflows with ActiveBatch so you can focus on higher value activities that drive your company forward.

Limitless Endpoints: Use native integrations and our low-code REST API adapter to connect to any server, any application, any service.

Proactive Support Model: 24/7- US-based support and predictive diagnostics.

Low Code Drag-and-Drop GUI: Easily build reliable, customizable, end-to-end processes.

ActiveBatch

$ Details
paid Free Trial
Platforms
Cross Platform
Release Date
2000 January

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

ActiveBatch videos

Redefine Your IT Automation Strategy with ActiveBatch

More videos:

  • Review - Demand More From Your IT Automation
  • Demo - ActiveBatch Self-Service Portal for Business Users

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Control-M and ActiveBatch)
IT Automation
64 64%
36% 36
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Workflow Automation
59 59%
41% 41
Product Deployment
64 64%
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using Control-M and ActiveBatch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Control-M and ActiveBatch

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

ActiveBatch Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
ActiveBatch is a versatile workload automation tool that can optimize and simplify manual and redundant tasks, enabling business process automation. ActiveBatch offers an intuitive drag-and-drop interface and a wide range of functionalities on a single platform for a centralized workload automation.
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
ActiveBatch offers a feature-rich workload automation tool. It’s a robust platform that provides security, auditing, and compliance as well as high availability of non-cluster failover. ActiveBatch’s Mobile Ops app makes it easy for field agents to stay connected with their workflows and processes while on the go.
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
ActiveBatch offers many features, including job scheduling, event-based triggers, file transfers, workload balancing, dependency tracking, notification and reporting capabilities, and support for various technologies and platforms. The software also includes a drag-and-drop visual interface and a pre-built library of job steps and templates, making it easier for users to...
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Control-M and ActiveBatch, you can also consider the following products

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

Stonebranch - Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

JAMS Scheduler - Enterprise workload automation software supporting processes on Windows, Linux, UNIX, iSeries, SAP, Oracle, SQL, ERPs and more.

Lastpass - LastPass is an online password manager and form filler that makes web browsing easier and more secure.

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.