Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Content Grabber VS AppImageKit

Compare Content Grabber VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

Content Grabber logo Content Grabber

Content Grabber is an automated web scraping tool.

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • Content Grabber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

Content Grabber videos

Tutorial Web Scrapping - Content Grabber - Telelistas

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Web scraping Zomato - Tutorial Content Grabber - Learning Web Scraping
  • Review - Content Grabber 2.0 what is new?

AppImageKit videos

No AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Content Grabber and AppImageKit)
Web Scraping
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
Data Extraction
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Content Grabber and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Content Grabber mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Content Grabber yet. Tracking of Content Grabber recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 11 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Content Grabber and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

import.io - Import. io helps its users find the internet data they need, organize and store it, and transform it into a format that provides them with the context they need.

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Octoparse - Octoparse provides easy web scraping for anyone. Our advanced web crawler, allows users to turn web pages into structured spreadsheets within clicks.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Apify - Apify is a web scraping and automation platform that can turn any website into an API.

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.