Based on our record, Signed Pages should be more popular than Confs.tech. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
To curate a list of talks for future viewing, I visit websites like confs.tech or dev.events, focusing on Backend engineering and Golang conferences. From there, it's a dive into individual conference websites to choose the talks to my "watch later" list. I give preference to conferences with shorter 30-minute talks over longer 50-minute sessions. As I think they provide better value to time ration. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
I found a pretty good conf aggregator here: https://confs.tech/?online=hybrid&topics=data Hopefully it can assist. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Some of these platforms like sessionize or papercall.io even let you set up your different talks as well as information about yourself, including your socials and speaker bio. This helps you keep track of conferences you have already applied for, quickly find new openings and submit your full applications at a click of a button. If you plan to submit many talks in the future, this might be good option to look... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Where to find them? Well just like the US I guess, just look into some event website likehttps://dev.events/https://confs.tech/Some might be targeted to the local language, but the better ones (IMO) are always in english. Source: almost 2 years ago
Find a conference, input your favorite topic, and there something may pop up. The best ones are free, and you shouldn't need to pay for a conference. Now, there is a free way Leon recommends:. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
There is "Signed Pages" by the debeloper of EteSync. It is a browser extension, that checks webapps based on signatures in the html file. The addon then warns the user if the signature is not correct or - if I remember correctly - the source changed. This allows you to be sure what webapp code was delivered. But it seems like it did not really get used outside of his own projects. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
EteSync has implemented something called Signed Pages, this might be worth looking closer at. This uses PGP keys which is preloaded into the browser; but I suspect that will be a barrier too high for most non-tech users. Source: about 1 year ago
There are also projects like signed web pages which can also help increasing the trust level to some degree. But that requires that you can download the source code and regenerate the verification hash locally - or have other trusted methods to verify the hash value hasn't been modified as well. The current concept is reasonably sane, but it requires too much from users currently to make it widely used. Source: almost 2 years ago
> The server can at any time start serving malicious payloads True, and I call this threat model "Beware Each and Every Fetch" (BEEF) in contrast to the more common TOFU model (although if you trust a desktop app to auto-update itself then these two models might not be all that different). In any case, I think you're being a little quick to dismiss the idea of server-hosted applications. It's true that browsers... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Something like a browser extension for this does already exist, fortunately: https://github.com/tasn/webext-signed-pages. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Huntathon - Browse and submit Product Hunt Global Hackathon projects
Marshal - Quickly scan your cloud for exposed sensitive information.
Konflist - Curated list of tech conferences all around the world!
The Security Checklist - The Practical Security Checklist for Web Developers
Challenge Hunt - Explore coding contests, hackathons from around the world
Google Capture the Flag 2017 - Google's 2nd annual worldwide security competition