Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Confluent VS Apache Fluo

Compare Confluent VS Apache Fluo and see what are their differences

TradingJournal
TradingJournal is a modern trade tracking app that helps traders understand their performance, reduce emotional mistakes, and optimize strategies. With risk analysis, pattern detection, and visual insights. Free and ad-free. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Confluent logo Confluent

Confluent offers a real-time data platform built around Apache Kafka.

Apache Fluo logo Apache Fluo

Big Data Processing and Distribution
  • Confluent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • Apache Fluo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-10

Confluent features and specs

  • Scalability
    Confluent is built on Apache Kafka, which allows for smooth scalability to handle growing data needs without significant performance degradation.
  • Real-Time Data Processing
    Confluent enables real-time streaming data processing, which is beneficial for applications requiring immediate data insights and actions.
  • Comprehensive Ecosystem
    Confluent provides a rich set of tools and connectors that integrate seamlessly with various data sources and sinks, making it easier to build and manage data pipelines.
  • Ease of Use
    Confluent offers an intuitive user interface and comprehensive documentation, which simplifies the setup and management of Kafka clusters.
  • Managed Service Option
    Confluent Cloud provides a fully managed Kafka service, reducing the operational burden on the engineering team and allowing businesses to focus on developing applications.
  • Advanced Security Features
    Confluent offers robust security features including encryption, SSL, ACLs, and more, ensuring that data streams are protected.
  • Strong Customer Support
    Confluent offers professional support and consultancy services which can be very helpful for enterprises requiring 24/7 support and expertise.

Possible disadvantages of Confluent

  • Cost
    Confluent can be expensive, especially for small to medium-sized businesses. The costs can grow significantly with scale and additional enterprise features.
  • Complexity
    Despite its ease of use, the underlying system’s complexity can pose a challenge, particularly for teams who are new to Kafka or streaming data technologies.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Confluent on-premises can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational and storage resources to maintain optimal performance.
  • Learning Curve
    For those unfamiliar with Kafka and streaming technologies, there is a steep learning curve which can lead to longer implementation times.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Utilizing Confluent’s proprietary tools and connectors can result in vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch to alternative solutions without considerable effort and reconfiguration.
  • Dependency on Cloud Provider
    If using Confluent Cloud, dependency on the cloud provider’s infrastructure may introduce compliance and control limitations, particularly for businesses with strict data sovereignty requirements.

Apache Fluo features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Confluent videos

+ Add

1. Intro | Monitoring Kafka in Confluent Control Center

More videos:

  • Review - Jason Gustafson, Confluent: Revisiting Exactly One Semantics (EOS) | Bay Area Apache Kafka® Meetup
  • Review - CLEARER SKIN AFTER 1 USE‼️| Ancient Cosmetics Update✨| CONFLUENT & RETICULATED PAPILLOMATOSIS CURE?😩

Apache Fluo videos

No Apache Fluo videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Confluent and Apache Fluo)

Confluent

Apache Fluo

Stream Processing
100 100%
Stream Processing
0% 0
Big Data
86 86%
Big Data
14% 14
Data Warehousing
0 0%
Data Warehousing
100% 100
Data Management
91 91%
Data Management
9% 9

User comments

Share your experience with using Confluent and Apache Fluo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache Fluo might be a bit more popular than Confluent. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Confluent. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Confluent mentions (1)

  • Spring Boot Event Streaming with Kafka
    We’re going to setup a Kafka cluster using confluent.io, create a producer and consumer as well as enhance our behavior driven tests to include the new interface. We’re going to update our helm chart so that the updates are seamless to Kubernetes and we’re going to leverage our observability stack to propagate the traces in the published messages. Source: over 3 years ago

Apache Fluo mentions (1)

  • Microsoft acquires Kinvolk
    Ah, Flatcar Linux Update Operator, got it. I was worried the Apache project with that name had somehow warped into babysitting Flatcar and ... I had questions. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Confluent and Apache Fluo, you can also consider the following products

Amazon Kinesis - Amazon Kinesis services make it easy to work with real-time streaming data in the AWS cloud.

Google Cloud Dataflow - Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.

Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.

Amazon EMR - Amazon Elastic MapReduce is a web service that makes it easy to quickly process vast amounts of data.

PieSync - Seamless two-way sync between your CRM, marketing apps and Google in no time

Google BigQuery - A fully managed data warehouse for large-scale data analytics.

Loading...