Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CompactView VS ShareDB

Compare CompactView VS ShareDB and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CompactView logo CompactView

Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

ShareDB logo ShareDB

Realtime database backend based on Operational Transformation (OT)
  • CompactView Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • ShareDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-02

CompactView features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    CompactView is open-source software available for free, allowing users to download, modify, and distribute the software without any cost.
  • Lightweight
    The software is lightweight, ensuring that it doesn't consume much system resources and runs efficiently even on older hardware.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    CompactView provides a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features without a steep learning curve.
  • Portable Application
    It is a portable application, meaning that it doesn't require installation and can be run from a USB drive, making it convenient for mobile use.
  • Focused on Specific Task
    CompactView focuses on a specific task, which is viewing Microsoft Compacted Files, providing great performance and reliability for this purpose.

Possible disadvantages of CompactView

  • Limited Features
    The software is designed primarily to view compacted files and lacks advanced editing or conversion features that some users might require.
  • Windows-Only
    CompactView is only available for Windows operating systems, making it inaccessible to macOS or Linux users without additional software like Wine.
  • No Active Support
    Being an open-source project, it may lack active customer support, relying instead on community forums for assistance.
  • Outdated Interface
    The interface may seem outdated compared to modern software, which could be off-putting to users accustomed to contemporary design aesthetics.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Since it's dependent on Windows, certain updates or system configurations may lead to compatibility issues unless correctly managed.

ShareDB features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CompactView and ShareDB)

CompactView

ShareDB

Databases
83 83%
Databases
17% 17
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
NoSQL Databases
83 83%
NoSQL Databases
17% 17
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CompactView and ShareDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CompactView and ShareDB, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft SQL Server Compact - Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

RxDB - A fast, offline-first, reactive Database for JavaScript Applications

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

Yjs - A CRDT framework with a powerful abstraction of shared data, Shared data types for building collaborative software

ObjectBox - ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

SignalDB - SignalDB is a reactive, local-first JavaScript database designed for modern web applications. It combines signal-based reactivity with powerful local data management and real-time synchronization capabilities.

Loading...