Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS marker.js

Compare Commit Together by Github VS marker.js and see what are their differences

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

marker.js logo marker.js

Add image annotation feature to your web apps
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • marker.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-04

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

marker.js features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Marker.js provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for users to annotate images quickly without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The tool supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same annotation project simultaneously, which enhances teamwork efficiency.
  • Customizable Annotation Tools
    Marker.js offers a variety of customizable annotation tools, enabling users to tailor their annotation experience according to specific needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The software is compatible with various web technologies and can be seamlessly integrated into different platforms and applications.
  • Lightweight and Fast
    Being a lightweight solution, Marker.js loads quickly and performs efficiently, which is ideal for web applications with performance constraints.

Possible disadvantages of marker.js

  • Feature Limitations
    While Marker.js offers a solid set of annotation tools, advanced users might find it lacking in features compared to more comprehensive annotation software.
  • Dependency on Web Environment
    As a web-based tool, Marker.js relies on an internet connection and compatible browsers, which may not suit environments that require offline access.
  • Potential Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when first using Marker.js, particularly if they are accustomed to different annotation tools.
  • Limited Support for Specialized Use Cases
    Organizations with highly specialized annotation needs might find Marker.js less suitable, necessitating additional tools or custom solutions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and marker.js)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
58 58%
42% 42
SaaS
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and marker.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

marker.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of marker.js yet. Tracking of marker.js recommendations started around Apr 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and marker.js, you can also consider the following products

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Annotable - Ultimate image annotation & markup tool

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Annotate Screen - Browser based annotation tool.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Jesi.app - An always up to date timezone widget for your email