Based on our record, Google Scholar seems to be a lot more popular than Coggle. While we know about 999 links to Google Scholar, we've tracked only 12 mentions of Coggle. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I find that reflecting on my experiences and going out of my way to really analyze the pitfalls and things done correctly helps a lot. I normally use coggle.it to mind map the whole experience overview and then which elements of the project seemed to be improvements and which parts where potentially poorly executed. I often find a lot more nuance this way than just scanning over it in my head. Source: about 1 year ago
In any case, any software that can create a visualization of a tree-like diagram will do the job. I'd recommend https://coggle.it/. Source: over 1 year ago
I have spent more time than I'd like to admit researching the different programs out there. Mindmup , Coggle, and Mindmesiter came the closest, but definitely not perfect. These are some of the features I am looking for:. Source: almost 2 years ago
Did it using https://coggle.it .. I have mindmaps self-hosted too but I feel this is much easier on the eye. Source: almost 2 years ago
Ah, because I found this mapping website called coggle.it and I was just wondering what if we made a map of including all the members of the fandom menace to see how big and how many members or connections they have, that's all really. Source: almost 2 years ago
A few may know, that google scholar(https://scholar.google.com/) does not offer a feature for arranging the search results based on the number of citations. Several years ago, one developer published a Python code (https://github.com/WittmannF/sort-google-scholar) to handle this. I had been inspired by his work, but I wanted to show the list of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
To that point, https://scholar.google.com/ is still useful. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
1) find the doi number [1a][1b] 2) find sources that cite the doi number -> google scholar[2][3] 3) filter for 'github' ----- [1a]resolve a doi name : https://dx.doi.org/ [1b]find a doi number : https://answers.lib.iup.edu/faq/31945 [2] : https://scholar.google.com/ [3] : google with "site:http://doi.org/" [4] : finding a doi in document page :... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Half of those are about science, during my Ph.D., I was told to use scholar.google.com, which works great as far as I can tell. Couple it to sci-hub and you get all the scientific literature you need. Source: 5 months ago
Scholar.google.com exists also which is what you use for studies. Source: 5 months ago
Xmind - Xmind is a brainstorming and mind mapping application.
PubMed.gov - PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
MindMeister - Create, share and collaboratively work on mind maps with MindMeister, the leading online mind mapping software. Includes apps for iPhone, iPad and Android.
SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers
MindManager - With MindManager, flexible mind maps promote freeform thinking and quick organization of ideas, so creativity and productivity can live in harmony.
Forge - Static web hosting made simple