Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeSandbox VS Wallaby.js

Compare CodeSandbox VS Wallaby.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CodeSandbox logo CodeSandbox

Online playground for React

Wallaby.js logo Wallaby.js

Wallaby.js runs your JavaScript tests immediately as you type and displays execution results in your code editor.
  • CodeSandbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-27
  • Wallaby.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

CodeSandbox features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CodeSandbox offers an intuitive interface that allows developers to quickly start coding without the need for complex setup or configuration.
  • Instant Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration, enabling multiple developers to work on the same project simultaneously.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    It provides a variety of pre-configured templates for popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, which saves time on setting up development environments.
  • Integrated Development
    CodeSandbox includes built-in terminal access and npm/yarn package management, making it possible to manage dependencies directly within the editor.
  • Live Previews
    Code changes are instantly compiled and displayed, providing immediate feedback with live previews of the application.
  • GitHub Integration
    Seamless integration with GitHub allows importing and exporting repositories, making it easier to manage version control and workflows.
  • Accessibility
    Being a web-based IDE, CodeSandbox can be accessed from any device with an internet connection, enhancing flexibility and mobility.

Possible disadvantages of CodeSandbox

  • Performance Issues
    Some users experience lag and slower performance, particularly with larger projects, compared to local development environments.
  • Limited Customization
    While convenient, the pre-configured environments might limit advanced customization options available in local IDEs.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As an online platform, a stable internet connection is required to use CodeSandbox effectively, which could be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Free Tier Limitations
    The free version comes with certain restrictions on resources and functionality, which might not be sufficient for larger or more complex projects.
  • Security Concerns
    Storing code in an online platform can raise security concerns, especially for sensitive or proprietary projects.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, developers new to online IDEs might face a learning curve in adapting from traditional, local development environments.

Wallaby.js features and specs

  • Fast Feedback
    Wallaby.js provides immediate feedback by running tests as you type, allowing developers to identify and fix issues quickly.
  • Inline Code Coverage
    It displays code coverage information directly in the editor, helping developers see which lines of code are covered by tests and which are not.
  • Productivity Boost
    By automating testing processes and providing real-time results, Wallaby.js enhances productivity, allowing developers to focus more on writing code rather than managing tests.
  • Integration
    Wallaby.js integrates with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs, and more, offering flexibility in various development environments.
  • Advanced Configuration
    The tool provides advanced configuration options, allowing developers to tailor the testing environment to suit their specific project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Wallaby.js

  • Cost
    Wallaby.js is a commercial product with a price tag, which might not be suitable for all developers or projects, especially open-source or hobby projects.
  • Complexity
    With its advanced features and options, there might be a learning curve for some developers, especially those who are new to such tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running continuous tests can be resource intensive, potentially slowing down the development environment on less powerful machines.
  • Limited Language Support
    Wallaby.js primarily supports JavaScript, TypeScript, and related frameworks, which may not be suitable for projects using other programming languages.
  • Environment Dependence
    Its full benefits are best experienced with supported IDEs, potentially limiting its utility in environments outside of those IDEs.

CodeSandbox videos

A browser IDE that's actually GOOD? (CodeSandbox.io Review!)

More videos:

Wallaby.js videos

introduction to wallaby.js STEP1(make library as jQuery plugin)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeSandbox and Wallaby.js)
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Programming
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeSandbox and Wallaby.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeSandbox and Wallaby.js

CodeSandbox Reviews

8 Best Replit Alternatives & Competitors in 2022 (Free & Paid) - Software Discover
Codesandbox is an online code editor and prototyping tool that makes creating and sharing web apps faster. Codesandbox: Online code editor and ide for rapid web development.
12 Best Online IDE and Code Editors to Develop Web Applications
CodeSandbox can be thought of as a much more powerful and complete take on JSFiddle. True to its name, CodeSandbox provides a complete code editor experience and a sandboxed environment for front-end development.
Source: geekflare.com

Wallaby.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Wallaby.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeSandbox seems to be a lot more popular than Wallaby.js. While we know about 310 links to CodeSandbox, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Wallaby.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeSandbox mentions (310)

  • How To Install Shadcn UI In React JS
    CodeSandbox Examples: Check out CodeSandbox for live projects using Shadcn UI. It’s a great way to see the toolkit in action. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Thankful for CodeSandbox
    I am thankful for a platform like CodeSandbox because it allows me to offload majority of the processing power and memory resources to the cloud. With a local VS Code installed, I can tunnel in via a remote connection to work on my projects, tinker, or do a deep-dive on certain topics; all while ensuring that the RPi 4 still has sufficient resources left to run other things in the background. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Some useful .new "shortcut" domains
    To create a new React JS environment in CodeSandbox. Similar domains include js.new, vue.new, etc.,. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Sonos CEO Patrick Spence steps down after app update debacle
    I have, it's called Visual Studio Code and I ditched my old native editor(s) for it. I'd even suggest that the fact that it's JS based has significantly changed the tech world because the editor itself will run in a browser so it's here https://godbolt.org/ , and here https://codesandbox.io, and here https://www.postman.com/, and here https://aws.amazon.com/pm/cloud9/ and 100s or 1000s of other sites. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • React Native Online Compiler: Compare the Top 5 Platforms for Your Development Needs
    CodeSandbox for web-first collaborative projects. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

Wallaby.js mentions (7)

  • Are there any continuous testing tools with real-time line-by-line IDE feedback for Rust?
    Basically I'm looking for https://wallabyjs.com/ for Rust. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Testing in ReScript
    Besides bindings for JavaScript libraries, there is rescript-test - a lightweight test framework written in ReScript for ReScript. I have heard that some people like it, but for me, it lacks coverage output and Wallaby support. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • I'd like to use a REPL in my workflow for getting feedback on my code. Is this a reasonable ask? If not, how do you check your code as you go?
    I’m a Clojure(script) dev learning TS. My Clojure REPL flow is Cursive + IntelliJ. The closest equivalent I’ve found is https://quokkajs.com for inline evaluation and https://wallabyjs.com for test evaluation. Both are paid products but have free 30 day evaluation periods. Both work in IntelliJ and VsCode. Source: over 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Current Issues with Jest Output and Workflow
    Https://wallabyjs.com/ covers pretty much every testing related needs for me. Source: about 3 years ago
  • jest package with highlighting results in window
    I recently switched from webstorm to emacs ( I'm super noob in emacs and lisp :) ) and one tool which I need was wallaby but unfortunately I didn't find anything like that for emacs. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeSandbox and Wallaby.js, you can also consider the following products

CodePen - A front end web development playground.

WompMobile - WompMobile offers tow kind of functions – first creating new mobile apps and secondly converting the websites into mobile applications.

replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.

Oracle Mobile Application - Oracle Mobile Application framework or Oracle Mobile Application development platform is a hybrid mobile framework for rapidly developing single source applications for many platforms and devices.

JSFiddle - Test your JavaScript, CSS, HTML or CoffeeScript online with JSFiddle code editor.

AppGyver Composer - Visual enterprise-grade low code mobile app builder