CodeOcean
replit
Open Science Framework
figshare
Watchist
Xpediter
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Web Inspector
MIT License
Simplified BSD License
AGPL
GPLv2
Creative Commons
The Unlicense
Premiumbeat
figshare
CodeOcean MIT LicenseMIT License might be a bit more popular than CodeOcean. We know about 4 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to CodeOcean. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I was an early hire at a computational reproducibility startup for scientists [0]; The platform was basically a web-based frontend wrapped around a Docker container hosted on AWS, and the idea was that you'd put your code and data on the platform and have it be online-executable indefinitely, and you wouldn't have to worry about package updates, functions breaking, etc., because it was containerized. The... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
It looks like Magniv is targeting Python in general. This is similar to ClearML. What are the differentiating points to Magniv compared to similar products? It seems like the product also integrates with SCM systems. Are you using gitea and then containers to push code and data to execution like CodeOcean? https://github.com/allegroai/clearml https://codeocean.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Code ocean also exists for this purpose, though the number of compute hours is limited on free academic licenses. Source: over 2 years ago
Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: 11 months ago
replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.
Simplified BSD License - Also known as the "2-clause" BSD license, this is a simplified version of an open source license created at the University of California Berkley.
Open Science Framework - Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.
AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.
figshare - Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.
GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.
