Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeGuard VS Icinga

Compare CodeGuard VS Icinga and see what are their differences

CodeGuard logo CodeGuard

CodeGuard provides website backup, monitoring, and malware remediation services to small and medium businesses.

Icinga logo Icinga

Icinga is a fork of Nagios and is backward compatible.
  • CodeGuard Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-27
  • Icinga Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

CodeGuard features and specs

  • Automatic Backups
    CodeGuard automatically backs up your website files and databases daily, ensuring that you have the latest versions available in case of data loss or corruption.
  • Easy Restoration
    Restoring your website to a previous version is seamless and can be done with just a few clicks, minimizing downtime and data loss.
  • Change Monitoring
    CodeGuard continuously monitors your website for any unauthorized changes, providing alerts so you can address potential issues promptly.
  • Website Encryption
    The service encrypts backups using AES-256 standards, ensuring data security both in transit and at rest.
  • Website Staging
    CodeGuard offers a staging environment where you can test changes before pushing them live, reducing the risk of errors on the live site.

Possible disadvantages of CodeGuard

  • Cost
    The service may be expensive for smaller businesses or individual users, particularly when scaling up to multiple websites.
  • Storage Limitations
    Different plans have varying storage limits which could be restrictive for larger sites requiring comprehensive backup coverage.
  • Database Support
    Some users might find the database backup options limited, particularly if they are using less common database systems.
  • Platform Dependency
    CodeGuard may not integrate perfectly with all web hosting platforms, potentially necessitating additional adjustments.
  • Technical Support
    Although CodeGuard provides technical support, some users report delays in response times or challenges in resolving more complex technical issues.

Icinga features and specs

  • Scalability
    Icinga is highly scalable and can easily handle monitoring for large and complex infrastructures, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Customization
    It offers extensive customization options through its modular architecture, allowing users to add or modify functionalities according to their needs.
  • Open-source
    Icinga is open-source software, which means it’s free to use and has strong community support. You can also contribute to its development.
  • Multi-platform support
    Icinga supports multiple operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, providing flexibility in deployment environments.
  • Advanced monitoring
    It offers advanced monitoring capabilities such as performance data collection, notifications, and automated actions.
  • Extensible
    Supports integration with various third-party tools and plugins, enhancing its functionality and allowing for seamless interoperation with other systems.
  • Robust API
    Includes a powerful REST API for managing configurations and retrieving data, which facilitates integration with other applications.

Possible disadvantages of Icinga

  • Complex setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be quite complex and time-consuming, which might be challenging for users without prior experience in network monitoring.
  • Learning curve
    Due to its extensive features and customization options, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing all of Icinga’s capabilities.
  • Documentation
    While comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be hard to navigate and may not cover advanced use cases in sufficient detail.
  • Resource Intensive
    Icinga can be resource-intensive, requiring significant system resources, especially when monitoring a large number of hosts and services.
  • Dependency on plugins
    Many features require additional plugins, which might necessitate deeper technical knowledge and effort to integrate and maintain.
  • Support
    Although there is a strong community, official support can be costly. Furthermore, community support may not always resolve complex issues promptly.

CodeGuard videos

Is Hostgator Codeguard Worth it? (Review) | Hostgator Site Backup

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Codeguard Setup and Tour - HostGator Tutorial
  • Review - CodeGuard Startup Battlefield Presentation

Icinga videos

Bernd Erk - Why favour Icinga over Nagios

More videos:

  • Review - Using The Icinga Linux Monitoring Wizard

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeGuard and Icinga)
Monitoring Tools
12 12%
88% 88
Log Management
14 14%
86% 86
Performance Monitoring
10 10%
90% 90
Incident Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeGuard and Icinga. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeGuard and Icinga

CodeGuard Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeGuard yet.
Be the first one to post

Icinga Reviews

11 Best Nagios Alternatives (Free & Open Source) in 2024
Icinga is an open-source app and a service monitoring tool. Icinga can report on the health of your IT environment. All alert dependencies are shown in the dashboard and sent via email, SMS, or mobile messaging apps.
Source: www.guru99.com
The Best Open Source Network Monitoring Tools in 2023
Description: Icinga is an open source network monitoring tool that measures network availability and performance. Through a web interface, your enterprise can observe hosts and applications across your entire network infrastructure. The tool is natively scalable and can easily be configured to work with every kind of device. There are also a handful of Icinga modules for...
10 Best Zabbix Alternatives
Icinga is a popular enterprise-grade open-source tool for IT infrastructure and application monitoring. It checks the availability of your network resources, notifies you of outages, and generates performance data for reporting. Icinga was originally created as a fork of the Nagios Core application in 2009. The goal is to improve upon the groundwork laid by Nagios, including...
10 Best Open Source Monitoring Software for IT Infrastructure
Icinga, which began as Nagios Fork in 2009, got freed from the constraints of a fork and crafted Icinga 2, which is faster, easier to configure, more comfortable to scale significantly better.
Source: geekflare.com
13 Best Nagios Alternatives for Networks, Servers, IT Systems Monitoring
Icinga2 started as a fork of Nagios and became an expansive network monitoring solution even for enterprise-grade needs.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Icinga should be more popular than CodeGuard. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeGuard mentions (1)

  • Self hosted backup solution like codeguard.com
    I'm looking for a centralised backup solution that can be self hosted. I would like to configure it to backup remote SFTP directories and MySQL databases exactly like codeguard.com does. Ideally it should have a web interface. It doesn't seem like there is anything like this. I did find some solutions however they were designed to run on the client and sync back to S3 etc. It would be great if I could have a... Source: about 4 years ago

Icinga mentions (8)

  • What do you use to visualize your topology?
    Two manually updated svg maps on nagvis that integrate with our icinga checks, one for the transport system nodes and one for the routers. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • SSLPing permanently goes out of service
    Might be a bit of an overkill if you just want to check the certificates, but I'm using Icinga (formerly known as Nagios) to keep track of all of the systems - including webpage certificates. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What "legacy" software are you still forced to use in 2022 that you wish would die?
    Some of it can be migrated rather easily to Icinga https://icinga.com/. Icinga forked from Nagios many years ago, they rewrote the engine and have done a nice WebUI. It is able to support e.g. Business branches using "satellites" that act as proxy to the main server/ server cluster. I was one of the two guys doing the setup for a company with multiple branch offices/ factories and during the time I was there it... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is there any program that can alert you of a stalled Plex Server?
    Personally I run https://icinga.com/ (to all my services, including Plex) and it polls every 5sec and after 5 fails in a row it sends me an email. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Linux is dead, long-live Docker monoculture
    Fast forward 12 years and I have Icinga2 collectors in each datacenter using check_by_ssh to run check_systemd, all front-ended by Thruk. The TIG stack is something on my list of things to look into at some point, but with Dynatrace available to do all the fancy application monitoring, there's no rush. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeGuard and Icinga, you can also consider the following products

Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.

Zabbix - Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources

Nagios - Complete monitoring and alerting for servers, switches, applications, and services

Librato - Your monitoring infrastructure in the cloud. Store, visualize and alert on all your metrics at all levels of the stack. Get your 30d free trial.

PagerDuty - Cloud based monitoring service

LibreNMS - A fully featured network monitoring system that provides a wealth of features and device support.