Codegrip
SonarQube
AppRefactoring
Codacy
CodeClimate
TSLint
Reek
RuboCop
Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
Parasoft C/C++test
PVS-Studio
Polyspace
lgtm.com
Codegrip is an automated code review tool that makes the code review process a matter of seconds. Codegrip provides detailed code review reports within a few seconds, automatically scans the code for bugs, code smells and vulnerabilities when the developer commits the code. It also Informs you about duplication percentage in the code along with duplicated blocks, files, and lines. Apart from this Codegrip also tells the user how much time would take to fix the bugs and gives suggested solutions to fix them. It is the only automated code review platform that does not store the user's code, keeping their IP safe.
Codegrip CppcheckNo features have been listed yet.
Cppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Using for my remote team, easy onboarding. Dashboard and project stats are helpful to make sure developers are writing quality code daily.
Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
AppRefactoring - Useful Online Tools for Programming code Analysts. Refactoring and Obfuscation for Software, Apps and Websites. Automated Code Plagiarism Checking.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.