Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeFactor.io VS Scrutinizer

Compare CodeFactor.io VS Scrutinizer and see what are their differences

CodeFactor.io logo CodeFactor.io

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket

Scrutinizer logo Scrutinizer

Powerful tools for measuring and improving code quality for open- and closed-source development projects.
  • CodeFactor.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-19
  • Scrutinizer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12

CodeFactor.io features and specs

  • Real-time Code Review
    CodeFactor.io provides immediate feedback on code changes by performing real-time code reviews, which helps catch issues early in the development process.
  • Integration with Popular Platforms
    The platform offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing easy adoption into existing workflows.
  • Detailed Reports
    Generates detailed reports with clear metrics and actionable insights on code quality, helping teams understand and improve their codebase.
  • Automated Code Review
    Automates the code review process, saving developers time and ensuring consistency in code quality assessments.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Supports a wide range of programming languages, making it versatile for teams working with diverse technology stacks.

Possible disadvantages of CodeFactor.io

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations in terms of features and the number of private repositories it can support, which may not be sufficient for larger teams or projects.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    Like many automated code review tools, CodeFactor.io can sometimes generate false positives or negatives, which might require manual inspection.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow analysis times, especially with very large codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve associated with interpreting some of the more detailed metrics and reports.
  • Customization Limitations
    The level of customization in the analysis rules and settings can be limited compared to some other code quality tools, potentially restricting its adaptability to specific team needs.

Scrutinizer features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Scrutinizer provides an in-depth analysis of your code, offering valuable insights into code quality, maintainability, and potential bugs.
  • Multi-language Support
    It supports multiple programming languages, making it versatile for projects developed in different coding environments.
  • Integrations
    Scrutinizer integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, enhancing the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Customizable Configuration
    Users can define custom configurations to tailor the analysis process to their specific needs.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale with the size of the projects, making it suitable for both small and large teams.

Possible disadvantages of Scrutinizer

  • Pricing
    While offering a free tier, more advanced features require a subscription, which might be expensive for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • Learning Curve
    The interface and configuration settings might be complex for new users, requiring a learning period to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Performance
    In some cases, analysis times can be slow, especially for larger codebases, impacting continuous integration workflows.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free plan comes with limitations that may not be sufficient for larger projects or more demanding needs.
  • Dependency on Third-party Tools
    Heavy reliance on third-party tools means any issues with these tools can indirectly affect the performance and functionality of Scrutinizer.

CodeFactor.io videos

Getting started with CodeFactor.io

Scrutinizer videos

Scrutinizer NetFlow Analyzer: Example Uses Part (2)

More videos:

  • Review - Scrutinizer NetFlow & sFlow Analyzer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeFactor.io and Scrutinizer)
Code Coverage
68 68%
32% 32
Code Quality
70 70%
30% 30
Code Analysis
73 73%
27% 27
Development
54 54%
46% 46

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeFactor.io and Scrutinizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Scrutinizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeFactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeFactor.io yet. Tracking of CodeFactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Scrutinizer mentions (2)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeFactor.io and Scrutinizer, you can also consider the following products

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

SensioLabs Insight - PHP Project Quality Done Right.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

Source Insight - Source Insight is a programming editor & code browser with built-in live analysis for C/C++, C#, Java, and more; helping you understand large projects.