Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CodeBehind Framework VS Spine.js

Compare CodeBehind Framework VS Spine.js and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

CodeBehind Framework logo CodeBehind Framework

CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.

Spine.js logo Spine.js

Build Awesome JavaScript MVC Applications
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (razor syntax)
    Only view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (standard syntax)
    Only view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (razor syntax)
    MVC view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (standard syntax)
    MVC view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC model
    MVC model //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC controller
    MVC controller //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Return template
    Return template //
    2023-12-25

CodeBehind library is a modern back-end framework and is an alternative to ASP.NET Core. This library is a programming model based on the MVC structure, which provides the possibility of creating dynamic aspx files in .NET Core and has high serverside independence. CodeBehind framework supports standard syntax and Razor syntax. This framework guarantees the separation of server-side codes from the design part (html) and there is no need to write server-side codes in the view.

Code Behind framework inherits every advantage of ASP.NET Core and gives it more simplicity, power and flexibility.

CodeBehind framework is an alternative to ASP.NET Core.

  • Spine.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-20

CodeBehind Framework

Website
elanat.net
$ Details
free
Platforms
Windows Linux MacOS
Release Date
2023 January
Edit details

Spine.js

Website
spine.github.io
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

CodeBehind Framework features and specs

  • RAD
    Development is fast with the Code Behind framework.
  • Fast
    The CodeBehind framework is faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
  • Simple
    Developing with CodeBehind is very simple. You can use mvc pattern or model-view or controller-view or only view.
  • Modular
    It is modular. Just copy the new project files, including dll and aspx, into the current active project.
  • Get output
    You can call the output of the aspx page in another aspx page and modify its output.
  • Under .NET Core
    Your project will still be under ASP.NET Core and you will benefit from all the benefits of .NET Core.
  • Code-Behind
    Code-Behind pattern will be fully respected.
  • Modern
    CodeBehind is a modern framework with revolutionary ideas.

Spine.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Spine.js is a lightweight JavaScript framework, which means it has a smaller footprint and is faster to load compared to larger frameworks like Angular or React.
  • MVC Architecture
    Spine.js uses the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, promoting organized and structured code, which helps in maintaining and scaling applications.
  • Simplicity
    The API of Spine.js is designed to be simple and minimalistic, which makes it easier for developers to learn and use.
  • Coffeescript Friendly
    Spine.js was originally designed to work seamlessly with CoffeeScript, offering syntactic sugar and a more concise syntax for developers who prefer CoffeeScript over JavaScript.

Possible disadvantages of Spine.js

  • Lack of Community Support
    Spine.js has a much smaller community compared to more popular frameworks, which means less community support, fewer tutorials, and a more limited selection of plugins and extensions.
  • Limited Features
    Being lightweight and minimalistic, Spine.js does not offer as many built-in features or components as larger frameworks, which might require more custom development for additional functionality.
  • Outdated
    Spine.js is not as actively maintained or updated as other modern frameworks, which may lead to issues in terms of compatibility with newer technologies or security updates.
  • CoffeeScript Dependency
    While CoffeeScript support is a pro for some, it can be a con for developers who are not familiar with CoffeeScript or prefer to stick to pure JavaScript.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeBehind Framework and Spine.js)

CodeBehind Framework

Spine.js

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
JavaScript Framework
100% 100
Web Frameworks
87 87%
Web Frameworks
13% 13
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing CodeBehind Framework and Spine.js.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The Elanat team has created a very large content management system called Elanat CMS using the CodeBehind framework.

What makes your product unique?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The CodeBehind framework is an engineering masterpiece; every project built with CodeBehind is modular and the project itself is a module. Return template is a wonderful feature of the CodeBehind framework; using the return template makes it unnecessary to add server-side codes in the HTML section.

What's the story behind your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The CodeBehind framework was created to compete with the default ASP.NET Core framework. Developing with CodeBehind framework is very easy and understandable, while developing in ASP.NET Core is hard and challenging.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

CodeBehind framework has a simple and understandable structure. This framework is even faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeBehind Framework and Spine.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeBehind Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeBehind Framework mentions (3)

  • ASP.NET Core New BackEnd Framework! CodeBehind 2.5 Released
    CodeBehind is a new back-end framework based on ASP.NET Core. CodeBehind is owned by the Elanat team and competes with Microsoft's default web frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, and Blazer) on .NET Core. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • How to Load Controller Class From Another DLL?
    As you can see, we introduced the modular structure of the powerful CodeBehind framework in practice. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • CodeBehind 2.1; aspx Back to ASP.NET Core
    CodeBehind page: Https://elanat.net/page_content/code_behind. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Spine.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Spine.js yet. Tracking of Spine.js recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeBehind Framework and Spine.js, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

Famous Engine - The Famous Engine is a free and open source JavaScript rendering engine.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

FeathersJS - Wow your users. Build incredible real-time applications in record time.

Loading...