Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CodeBehind Framework VS Opa

Compare CodeBehind Framework VS Opa and see what are their differences

CodeBehind Framework logo CodeBehind Framework

CodeBehind is a new framework based on .NET Core version 7.0. The CodeBehind framework inherits all the features of .NET Core and gives it more simplicity and flexibility. CodeBehind framework is owned by Elanat.

Opa logo Opa

Opa is an open source, simple and unified platform for writing web applications.
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (razor syntax)
    Only view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Only view (standard syntax)
    Only view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (razor syntax)
    MVC view (razor syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC view (standard syntax)
    MVC view (standard syntax) //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC model
    MVC model //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework MVC controller
    MVC controller //
    2023-12-25
  • CodeBehind Framework Return template
    Return template //
    2023-12-25

CodeBehind library is a modern back-end framework and is an alternative to ASP.NET Core. This library is a programming model based on the MVC structure, which provides the possibility of creating dynamic aspx files in .NET Core and has high serverside independence. CodeBehind framework supports standard syntax and Razor syntax. This framework guarantees the separation of server-side codes from the design part (html) and there is no need to write server-side codes in the view.

Code Behind framework inherits every advantage of ASP.NET Core and gives it more simplicity, power and flexibility.

CodeBehind framework is an alternative to ASP.NET Core.

  • Opa Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

CodeBehind Framework

Website
elanat.net
$ Details
free
Platforms
Windows Linux MacOS
Release Date
2023 January

CodeBehind Framework features and specs

  • RAD
    Development is fast with the Code Behind framework.
  • Fast
    The CodeBehind framework is faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.
  • Simple
    Developing with CodeBehind is very simple. You can use mvc pattern or model-view or controller-view or only view.
  • Modular
    It is modular. Just copy the new project files, including dll and aspx, into the current active project.
  • Get output
    You can call the output of the aspx page in another aspx page and modify its output.
  • Under .NET Core
    Your project will still be under ASP.NET Core and you will benefit from all the benefits of .NET Core.
  • Code-Behind
    Code-Behind pattern will be fully respected.
  • Modern
    CodeBehind is a modern framework with revolutionary ideas.

Opa features and specs

  • Full-Stack Development
    Opa is designed to be a full-stack language, which means it can handle both the client-side and server-side development within a single codebase. This reduces the need for context switching between multiple programming languages and can simplify the development process.
  • Security Features
    Opa includes built-in security features such as automatic data validation and prevention of common web vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection, potentially reducing the number of security issues in web applications.
  • Concurrency Support
    Opa natively supports asynchronous programming and concurrency, allowing developers to write efficient, non-blocking code without needing additional frameworks or libraries.
  • Integrated Web Development
    The language integrates multiple aspects of web development such as database, server, and client interactions, aiming to streamline the process and reduce the complexity of managing disparate technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Opa

  • Limited Adoption
    Opa is not widely adopted, which can result in a smaller community and fewer resources, tutorials, or third-party libraries compared to more popular web development languages and frameworks.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to Opa might face a steep learning curve due to its unique approach and syntax, which differs considerably from more traditional web development languages.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    The tooling and ecosystem around Opa may not be as mature or robust as those surrounding other more established languages, potentially leading to challenges in finding compatible tools or plugins.
  • Performance Overheads
    While Opa abstracts many details for developers, this abstraction can introduce performance overheads compared to languages that allow more fine-tuned control over performance optimizations.

CodeBehind Framework videos

No CodeBehind Framework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Opa videos

My food review at Opa of Greece!

More videos:

  • Review - Classic Game Room - OPA OPA review for Sega Mark III

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeBehind Framework and Opa)
Web Frameworks
68 68%
32% 32
Developer Tools
70 70%
30% 30
Python Web Framework
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing CodeBehind Framework and Opa.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The Elanat team has created a very large content management system called Elanat CMS using the CodeBehind framework.

What makes your product unique?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The CodeBehind framework is an engineering masterpiece; every project built with CodeBehind is modular and the project itself is a module. Return template is a wonderful feature of the CodeBehind framework; using the return template makes it unnecessary to add server-side codes in the HTML section.

What's the story behind your product?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

The CodeBehind framework was created to compete with the default ASP.NET Core framework. Developing with CodeBehind framework is very easy and understandable, while developing in ASP.NET Core is hard and challenging.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CodeBehind Framework's answer

CodeBehind framework has a simple and understandable structure. This framework is even faster than the default structure of cshtml pages in ASP.NET Core.

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeBehind Framework and Opa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Opa might be a bit more popular than CodeBehind Framework. We know about 3 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to CodeBehind Framework. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeBehind Framework mentions (3)

  • ASP.NET Core New BackEnd Framework! CodeBehind 2.5 Released
    CodeBehind is a new back-end framework based on ASP.NET Core. CodeBehind is owned by the Elanat team and competes with Microsoft's default web frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, and Blazer) on .NET Core. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • How to Load Controller Class From Another DLL?
    As you can see, we introduced the modular structure of the powerful CodeBehind framework in practice. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • CodeBehind 2.1; aspx Back to ASP.NET Core
    CodeBehind page: Https://elanat.net/page_content/code_behind. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Opa mentions (3)

  • Imba – The friendly full-stack language
    I remember Opa http://opalang.org/ tried something similar at the time when MongoDB was new and modern. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What web frameworks/technologies did not succeed as per your expectation
    We come across some web frameworks and technologies that we think will succeed, but they wither away as time passes by and don't succeed to the level we expected. Which web frameworks and or technologies did you come across that you thought would succeed but did not as per your expectations? For example, I thought that Opa Lang[0] and UrWeb[1] would succeed but did not, even though the ideas were sound. [0]... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Modern JavaScript:Everything you missed over the last 10 years(ECMAScript 2020)
    I think the Opa language was doing JSX-like code in the frontend before JSX http://opalang.org/ Both Opa and JSX were created in 2011. Opa had other innovations as well, such having the same code base run on both client and server (like Next.js). Unfortunately it didn't get traction and was abandoned by the creators. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeBehind Framework and Opa, you can also consider the following products

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans