Based on our record, Stack Overflow Trends should be more popular than Code NASA. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
NASA has a good set of open source projects available for public use: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Yes, this is no-cost but not necessarily open source. NASA open source software can be found at: https://code.nasa.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
As for public telemetry it might be hard to get it for free as satellite owners do it for money. NASA maintains a public software page at code.nasa.gov and software.nasa.gov which includes OpenMCT mission control software that can do simulated data. Source: over 3 years ago
Don't underestimate the strength of personal projects. If you ask a professor about their research, I find very often, they ask about things you have done in the past, which sort of feels like shit if youve done nothing huh? I know people who made cloud chambers or shot ions or massive simulations in HS and I was like, a theatre kid which is so irrelevant. BUT. The reason they ask this is that previous experience... Source: almost 4 years ago
This would be a place to start. Https://code.nasa.gov/. Source: almost 4 years ago
It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Google Open Source - All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella
Smarty Bot - Wiki for tech teams, right where work happens
Open NASA - NASA data, tools, and resources
Stack Roboflow - Coding questions pondered by an AI.
NASA Exoplanet Posters - Imagine visiting worlds outside our solar system
Google Trends Visualizer - Beautifully visualize real-time search trends