Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Code.gov VS PullRequest.com

Compare Code.gov VS PullRequest.com and see what are their differences

Code.gov logo Code.gov

Share & reuse open source code from the Federal Government

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service
  • Code.gov Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-24
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

Code.gov

Website
code.gov
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

Code.gov features and specs

  • Transparency
    Code.gov promotes transparency by making government source code available to the public, allowing citizens to see and understand the work being done by government agencies.
  • Collaboration
    By sharing code, Code.gov facilitates collaboration between government agencies, private sector, and citizens, fostering innovation and improvements to the code through community contributions.
  • Cost Efficiency
    Reusing existing code can reduce the costs associated with developing new software, leading to cost savings for government projects.
  • Open Source Adoption
    The platform encourages the adoption of open-source software practices within government agencies, promoting a culture of openness and agility.

Possible disadvantages of Code.gov

  • Security Risks
    Making code available to the public can expose security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors if not properly managed.
  • Resource Intensive
    Maintaining and managing an open source code repository requires significant resources and commitment from government agencies to ensure code quality and security.
  • Intellectual Property Concerns
    There could be legal and intellectual property challenges over the ownership and use of code, especially if the code includes contributions from private sector entities.
  • Adoption Resistance
    Some government agencies may resist adopting open source practices or sharing their code due to cultural and bureaucratic barriers.

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Code.gov and PullRequest.com)
Productivity
64 64%
36% 36
Developer Tools
34 34%
66% 66
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Tech
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Code.gov and PullRequest.com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Code.gov should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Code.gov mentions (3)

  • AMD Monster Radeon RX 7900XTX Graphics Card Rumored To Take On NVidia RTX 4090
    And much of the code written by scientists using government grants has to be open source by law and there's a site where you can view it all. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Do/can FOSS app developers make money for a living?
    There's the worker bee model. You find a company dedicated to FOSS like Google, RedHat, Intel, etc., join them, and work your way into a position where you're maintaining something open source but salaried through your employer. There are smaller companies where this may apply, too, although the big ones are of course those that may jump to mind. You'll also find some open source opportunities within the... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • When software depends on a project thanklessly maintained by a random guy in Nebraska, is open source sustainable?
    I do like the trend of new government projects open sourcing their systems, like https://code.gov. Source: about 4 years ago

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Code.gov and PullRequest.com, you can also consider the following products

Marmoset - Create gorgeous code snapshots.

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Code2Flow - An easy solution to create product flows.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

CodeMyUI - Handpicked code snippets you can use in your web projects

Code Review by Codementor - Get an expert to review your code on-demand