Software Alternatives & Reviews

CocoPacket VS iperf

Compare CocoPacket VS iperf and see what are their differences

CocoPacket logo CocoPacket

Official web for latency monitoring tool

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • CocoPacket Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

CocoPacket videos

No CocoPacket videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

iperf videos

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CocoPacket and iperf)
OS & Utilities
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
7 7%
93% 93
Log Management
9 9%
91% 91
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CocoPacket and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CocoPacket mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CocoPacket yet. Tracking of CocoPacket recommendations started around Mar 2021.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CocoPacket and iperf, you can also consider the following products

SmokePing - Smokeping is a tool for measuring latency.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

GPING - GPING (Graphical Ping) is a powerful utility that pings and graphs multiple hosts simultaneously...

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

PingPlotter - PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.