Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login
CRC

Cocoa Rest Client VS Hurl.dev

Compare Cocoa Rest Client VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

Momen
Build powerful web apps, and create your custom AI apps, no code needed! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Cocoa Rest Client logo Cocoa Rest Client

A free open source, native Apple OS X app for testing HTTP/REST endpoints

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.
  • Cocoa Rest Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-23
  • Hurl.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cocoa Rest Client and Hurl.dev)

Cocoa Rest Client

Hurl.dev

Developer Tools
26 26%
Developer Tools
74% 74
API Tools
26 26%
API Tools
74% 74
APIs
27 27%
APIs
73% 73
Command Line Tools
17 17%
Command Line Tools
83% 83

User comments

Share your experience with using Cocoa Rest Client and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cocoa Rest Client mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cocoa Rest Client yet. Tracking of Cocoa Rest Client recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Hurl.dev mentions (39)

  • Bruno
    You may be able to replace some of your curl+shell with Hurl — https://hurl.dev/#also-an-http-test-tool . - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Bruno
    I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Libcurl
    Shameless promotion: Hurl [1] is an Open Source cli using libcurl to run and tests HTTP requests with plain text! We use libcurl for the super reliability and top features (HTTP/3 for instance) and we've added little features like: - requests chaining, - capturing and passing data from a response to another request, - response tests (JSONPath, XPath, etc...) There is nice syntax sugar for resuesting... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Hoppscotch Desktop Application
    - This too will suffer the same fate as the previous two and will gradually also adopt a busy, unworkable, confusing UI This is why I’ve started using Hurl because that doesn’t even have a UI. Bonus: can be kept in source control and run as part of CI/CD. https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/ https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Best practices for HarperDB projects using TypeScript
    Testing our application is a matter of running npm run start:dev and making requests to it. To test it better I'll leave a Hurl file in the repository that you can use to test the API. You can run it using hurl --test ./collection.hurl. This will run all the tests and make sure that everything is working as expected. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cocoa Rest Client and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products

Graphical HTTP Client - Graphical Http Client is a utility to help you test and interact with REST-based web services.

Insomnia REST - The most intuitive cross-platform REST API Client 😴

Hurl.it - Hurl makes HTTP requests.

Paw.cloud - Paw is a REST client for Mac.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Loading...