Software Alternatives & Reviews

Cocoa Rest Client VS Hurl.dev

Compare Cocoa Rest Client VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

Cocoa Rest Client logo Cocoa Rest Client

A free open source, native Apple OS X app for testing HTTP/REST endpoints

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.
Cocoa Rest Client Landing Page
Cocoa Rest Client Landing Page
Hurl.dev Landing Page
Hurl.dev Landing Page

Cocoa Rest Client details

Categories
API Tools Developer Tools APIs
Website mmattozzi.github.io  

Hurl.dev details

Categories
Command Line Tools HTTP HTTP Test Tool Web Development Tools
Website hurl.dev  

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cocoa Rest Client and Hurl.dev)
34
34%
66%
66
37
37%
63%
63
35
35%
65%
65
100
100%
0%
0

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cocoa Rest Client mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cocoa Rest Client yet. Tracking of Cocoa Rest Client recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Hurl.dev mentions (24)

  • Twenty-Five Years of Curl
    You could also try Hurl [1] which is a cli tool using plain text and libcurl for run and test HTTP requests. I'm one of the maintainer and very grateful to curl/libcurl! My project couldn't exist without it. [1] https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 10 days ago
  • Postman is limiting local collection runner to 25 runs for basic plans
    Shameless plug: why not switch to Hurl [1], an open source cli tool to run and test HTTP requests in plain text, with libcurl under the hood? (I'm one of the maintainer) [1]: https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • The building blocks of great docs
    On my iPhone, when I click on home links (let's say Webhooks & notifications), I'm redirected to the middle of the target page. I'm sure it's a small bug, but it's kind of sad that basic navigation is half broken. On my pet documentation site [1], I've chosen the boring way: - fully static HTML (Jekyll) - minimal JavaScript (especially no tracking) - search is local I find mysite quite reactive without complicated... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • KATT (Klarna API Testing Tool) Is an HTTP-Based API Testing Tool for Erlang
    I've recently used Hurl [1] in some projects. It seems to have a similar goal and I like I a lot. [1]: https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text
    A better url might be https://hurl.dev/ Hurl runs super fast without startup latency unlike a lot of tools in this category written in node. The plain text format can be checked in and this can be part of your CI process. Hurl can capture data from previous requests to run workflows and serve as a testing tool. The main downside is the lack of a GUI, although I imagine it being not that hard to do something like... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cocoa Rest Client and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products

Hurl.it - Hurl makes HTTP requests.

Insomnia REST - The most intuitive cross-platform REST API Client 😴

Graphical HTTP Client - Graphical Http Client is a utility to help you test and interact with REST-based web services.

Paw.cloud - Paw is a REST client for Mac.

gURL - gURL is a free, Open Source (GPL) HTTP request generator tool.

RESTClient - RESTClient can be used to test variety of HTTP communications and RESTful webservices.

User reviews

Share your experience with using Cocoa Rest Client and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with