CNN VS USA TODAY

Observe how news media treat story like this. https://time.com - first page, main story, no photos https://www.reuters.com - no mention https://apnews.com - first page, 2nd block in list, no photos https://www.nytimes.com - second page, tiny block in list, no photos https://www.washingtonpost.com - second page, tiny block, no photos https://www.theguardian.com/world - no mention https://www.aljazeera.com - first... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

If it's any consolation, it was top billing on cnn.com yesterday, which is where I first saw it. Entire top left of the screen was the woman's face and a huge headline. Now it's buried in a couple lines below the (digital) fold. Source: 5 months ago

Try and force the page by entering a url in the browser such as cnn.com . Also, try loading a full browser and trying to surf. What type of phone are you on? Source: 5 months ago

FWIW, I had to disable the Wipr content filtering on cnn.com to see the web site. Guess I'll get my news fix from wapo.com, now. Source: 5 months ago

I don't know what EasyList or uBlock are (i.e., I don't use those), but I got blocked by cnn.com as well. Firefox on Mac. Turns out it was the "I don't care about cookies" extension (automatically accept consent requests). Once I disabled that for cnn, it worked again. Source: 5 months ago

Which is odd, usually places actually post the response not just that someone refused. Does that mean it just didn't respond? It's really just pinknews and a weird usatoday.news site instead of the real usatoday.com site where I can find this after searching, and some twitter users linking it. Source: over 1 year ago

John Mueller from Google said they are. There was a Search Engine Journal article where he said they are able to catch most of them and make them not worth anything. We have tried web 2.0 vs standard link building and we noticed that Google does devalue a lot of web 2.0 links. We had a site with 1000 links and another with 13000 in the same niche but the 13000 was web 2.0 and the site with 1000 ranks higher on... Source: over 1 year ago

No source from usatoday.com actually proves any of this.... Nothing has been updated since she assumed office in 2019. This sub blows my mind. You all talk about how stupid any other sub is but just chew on and push anything that fits you. I can stop shaking my head at both sides and the amount of bullshit everyone just takes as facts. Source: over 1 year ago

App / URL: cnn.com, msn.com, usatoday.com (just these three to test, blocking obvious sections games, esports, mail, sports, etc). Source: almost 2 years ago

Hi everyone: That’s all I have time to answer today. Thank you for all the questions. Keep following our coverage at usatoday.com and email me with tips, questions etc at jmeyer@usatoday.com. Source: about 2 years ago