Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CMU Common Lisp VS LispIDE

Compare CMU Common Lisp VS LispIDE and see what are their differences

CMU Common Lisp logo CMU Common Lisp

CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

LispIDE logo LispIDE

LispIDE is a basic graphical shell for several Lisp and Scheme implementations available for...
  • CMU Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-15
  • LispIDE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-16

CMU Common Lisp features and specs

  • High-Performance Compiler
    CMU Common Lisp features an efficient native code compiler that can produce highly optimized code for the supported platforms, enhancing performance for computationally-intensive applications.
  • Extensive Library Support
    Includes a wide variety of libraries, providing functionality ranging from numerical computing to system interfacing, which allows developers to implement diverse applications without relying heavily on external packages.
  • Strong Typing System
    CMUCL provides a strong type system with good error detection and optimization capabilities that can help catch errors at compile-time and improve runtime performance.
  • Garbage Collection
    It includes an efficient garbage collector that manages memory naturally, minimizing manual intervention and reducing memory leaks and fragmentation in applications.
  • Comprehensive Integrated Development Environment
    CMUCL comes with an integrated environment which includes a debugger, inspector, and an interface for efficient development and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of CMU Common Lisp

  • Limited Platform Support
    The number of platforms explicitly supported by CMUCL is limited, which can be a constraint for developers who need to work across multiple or newer systems.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Newcomers might find CMUCL challenging due to its complexity and the intricate features specific to Lisp, requiring a steep learning curve compared to more modern languages and environments.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users find the documentation to be outdated or not comprehensive enough, making it difficult to get started and fully leverage the system's capabilities.
  • Limited Community Support
    The user and contributor community for CMUCL is relatively small compared to other languages and projects, which may result in less frequent updates and fewer third-party resources.
  • Complex Setup Process
    Initial setup and configuration of CMUCL can be cumbersome, especially for users not familiar with Lisp environments or those who require specific custom configurations.

LispIDE features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CMU Common Lisp and LispIDE)
Programming Language
82 82%
18% 18
Text Editors
65 65%
35% 35
IDE
76 76%
24% 24
OOP
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CMU Common Lisp and LispIDE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CMU Common Lisp and LispIDE, you can also consider the following products

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

LispWorks - LispWorks is a commercial implementation and IDE for the Common Lisp programming language.

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

Clozure Common Lisp - Clozure CL (often called CCL for short) is a free Common Lisp implementation with a long history.

Lem - Cross-platform and highly extensible Commo Lisp editor/IDE.