CMake VS Post Affiliate Pro

CMake Reviews

Post Affiliate Pro Reviews

1. Ryan    

   Marketer at Quality Unit | about 4 years ago
   The most powerful affiliate marketing softwarer

   I have personally used Post Affiliate Pro for almost 2. While I had some small issues, the customer support team quickly resolved them. The software is pretty affordable and has a lot of excellent features and many, many integrations. We took the advantage of free set-up and integration, which was a very nice gesture from the company.

   🏁 Competitors: iDevAffiliate

   👍 Pros:    Affordable|Easy to use|Quick|Excellent features

CMake mentions (51)

• Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.

  CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• My first Software Release using GitHub Release

  When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• A little help for a C++ newbie

  Install the CMake program using your system package manager, e.g. Sudo apt-get install cmake. Source: 7 months ago

• Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows

  Oh I just assumed it was talking about the one from cmake.org since I was having trouble. I can now confirm that mingw-w64-cmake and the binary from cmake.org do operate in mostly identical ways. Source: about 1 year ago

• Questions Regarding working with Mingw_w64, MSYS2, and CMake on Windows

  Then looking at any one of the many examples provided on cmake.org, it's clearly a viable way to do set(CMAKE_*), (e.g., set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11) Set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED True)). Of course, another way to set these variables is to use the -D flag as you suggested, but I was just wondering why you would prohibit using set(CMAKE_*). Source: about 1 year ago

Post Affiliate Pro mentions (0)