Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CloudShare VS Packer

Compare CloudShare VS Packer and see what are their differences

PulpMiner
Converts Any Webpage Into Realtime JSON API 🟢 featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CloudShare logo CloudShare

ClousShare provides a cloud-computing platform for developing and testing IT applications, software and systems.

Packer logo Packer

Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.
  • CloudShare Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13
  • Packer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

CloudShare features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CloudShare's intuitive interface allows users to easily set up and manage their virtual environments. Its user-friendly design reduces the learning curve for new users.
  • Scalability
    The platform supports scalable environments, making it suitable for enterprises of all sizes. Users can expand their operations without significant infrastructure changes.
  • Performance
    CloudShare provides high-performance virtual machines and seamless data transfer, ensuring that complex applications run smoothly without latency or interruptions.
  • Security
    CloudShare integrates various security measures including data encryption, network security protocols, and compliance with industry standards to protect user information.
  • Collaborative Features
    CloudShare includes built-in collaboration tools, allowing teams to work together in real-time from different locations, which is beneficial for training and development sessions.
  • Customer Support
    The platform offers comprehensive customer support services, including 24/7 support, detailed documentation, and a responsive help desk to resolve issues promptly.

Possible disadvantages of CloudShare

  • Pricing
    The cost of using CloudShare can be significant, especially for smaller businesses or individual users. The pricing model may not be suitable for those with tight budgets.
  • Complexity of Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, some advanced features can be complex and may require additional training or support to use effectively.
  • Resource Intensity
    Running high-performance virtual environments can be resource-intensive, consuming significant amounts of bandwidth and processing power, potentially affecting other operations.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    As a cloud-based service, CloudShare requires stable and high-speed internet connectivity. Downtime or poor connectivity can greatly disrupt services and user productivity.
  • Limited Offline Access
    CloudShare environments are not generally available offline, which can be a drawback for users who need to work in areas with limited internet access.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Users may experience vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate environments or data to other platforms without significant effort and potential downtime.

Packer features and specs

  • Multi-Provider Support
    Packer supports a wide variety of providers such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, VMware, and more. This allows for flexibility and the ability to create machine images across different environments.
  • Automation
    Packer automates the creation of machine images, eliminating the need for manual image configuration and reducing the potential for human error.
  • Script Reusability
    Packer allows for the reuse of scripts and configuration files, enabling a consistent and repeatable process for image creation.
  • Parallel Builds
    Packer can build multiple images in parallel, which can significantly speed up the provisioning process.
  • Idempotency
    Packer ensures that the output machine image is always an identical result given the same input configuration, reducing the risk of inconsistencies.

Possible disadvantages of Packer

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The variety of features and flexibility that Packer offers can make it complex and challenging to learn, especially for beginners.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Packer's debugging tools are not as mature or as integrated as those found in some other DevOps tools, making troubleshooting more difficult.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Complex configurations with multiple builders and provisioners can become hard to manage and maintain, leading to potential errors.
  • No State Management
    Unlike Terraform, Packer does not manage state, which means users need to handle state management separately if required.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Packer often relies on external scripts and tools for provisioning, which can introduce additional dependencies and complexities.

Analysis of CloudShare

Overall verdict

  • CloudShare is generally regarded as a good solution for organizations looking for a reliable and efficient platform to host virtual IT labs. Its ability to provide high-quality training environments while reducing the need for physical hardware makes it a valuable option for many businesses, particularly in tech-driven industries.

Why this product is good

  • CloudShare is known for its robust platform that facilitates the creation of training and testing environments in the cloud. It offers ease of use, scalability, and flexibility, which makes it attractive to many businesses aiming to streamline their training and development processes. The platform's strong points include its ability to simulate complex environments, extensive collaboration features, and integration capabilities with various tools and services.

Recommended for

  • IT training providers
  • Software development teams
  • Organizations needing realistic testing environments
  • Educational institutions focusing on technical courses

Analysis of Packer

Overall verdict

  • Packer is a valuable tool for organizations looking to streamline their image building process and maintain consistency across different environments. Its flexibility and wide range of features make it a strong asset in infrastructure automation and DevOps pipelines.

Why this product is good

  • Packer is considered a good tool because it automates the creation of machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configuration. This efficiency reduces errors and speeds up the deployment process. Packer is highly versatile and integrates well with various configuration management tools, broadening its applicability across different environments. It also supports multiple cloud providers, making it a great choice for multi-cloud strategies.

Recommended for

  • DevOps teams
  • Cloud infrastructure engineers
  • Organizations using multi-cloud strategies
  • Teams seeking automated and consistent image building processes
  • Developers looking to integrate infrastructure as code practices

CloudShare videos

+ Add

CloudShare Customer Testimonial: Check Point implements virtual labs for live sales demos

More videos:

  • Review - CloudShare Customer Testimonial: Tufin implements virtual labs for training and proofs of concept
  • Demo - CloudShare Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) Demo

Packer videos

No Packer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CloudShare and Packer)

CloudShare

Packer

DevOps Tools
35 35%
DevOps Tools
65% 65
Continuous Integration And Delivery
33 33%
Continuous Integration And Delivery
67% 67
Other Infrastructure Tools
34 34%
Other Infrastructure Tools
66% 66
Product Deployment
100 100%
Product Deployment
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CloudShare and Packer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CloudShare and Packer

CloudShare Reviews

We have no reviews of CloudShare yet.
Be the first one to post

Packer Reviews

Introduction to Top Open Source Virtualization Tools
Packer is notably light, high performing, and operates on every major operating system. It assembles and configures all the necessary components for a virtual machine then creates images that run on multiple platforms. Packer doesn’t replace configuration management tools like Puppet or Chef; as a matter of fact, when creating images, Packer can utilize tools like Puppet or...
Source: www.getfilecloud.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CloudShare mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CloudShare yet. Tracking of CloudShare recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Packer mentions (9)

  • Failed to connect to the host via SSH on Ubuntu 22.04
    If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to be useful for you. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Create a minimalist OS using Docker Containers and Hashicorp Packer
    I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and configurations and the user can simply trigger a couple of Commands to get a minimalist OS at the end of the process. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • After self-hosting my email for twenty-three years I have thrown in the towel. The oligopoly has won.
    And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a terminal, even though making the initial configuration takes some time. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Customized Ubuntu Images using Packer + QEMU + Cloud-Init & UEFI bootloading
    Hashicorp Packer provides a nice wrapper / abstraction over the QEMU in order to boot the image and use it to set it up on first-boot. Instead of writing really long commands in order to boot up the image using QEMU, Packer provided a nice Configuration Template in a more Readable fashion. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • The journey of sharing a wired USB printer over the network
    Packer seemed like the perfect tool for the job. I have never used it before and wanted to get familiar with the tool. It doesn't come with ARM support out of the box, but there are two community projects to fill that niche. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CloudShare and Packer, you can also consider the following products

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Red Hat OpenShift - Application and Data, Application Hosting, and Platform as a Service

HHVM - HHVM is an open-source virtual machine designed for executing programs written in Hack and PHP.

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

Loading...