Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CloudMQTT VS NATS

Compare CloudMQTT VS NATS and see what are their differences

CloudMQTT logo CloudMQTT

CloudMQTT implements MQ Telemetry Transport protocol for carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe message queueing model.

NATS logo NATS

NATS.io is an open source messaging system for cloud native applications, IoT messaging, Edge, and microservices architectures.
  • CloudMQTT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-25
  • NATS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-05

NATS.io is a connective technology for distributed systems and is a perfect fit to connect devices, edge, cloud or hybrid deployments. True multi-tenancy makes NATS ideal for SaaS and self-healing and scaling technology allows for topology changes anytime with zero downtime.

CloudMQTT features and specs

  • Scalability
    CloudMQTT allows you to scale your connections and usage based on your needs, providing flexibility for growing applications.
  • Managed Infrastructure
    The service provides a fully managed MQTT broker infrastructure, saving time and resources on setup and maintenance.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    CloudMQTT supports multiple platforms and devices, making integration with a variety of applications and services easier.
  • Security
    Offers features like SSL/TLS encryption and authentication mechanisms to ensure secure data transmission and prevent unauthorized access.
  • User Friendly
    The platform offers an easy-to-use interface with comprehensive documentation, making it accessible even for beginners.

Possible disadvantages of CloudMQTT

  • Cost
    While there are different pricing tiers, the cost can increase significantly with higher usage and the need for advanced features.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying on a specific service provider can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch providers without significant effort and restructuring.
  • Limited Offline Access
    As a cloud-based service, it requires an internet connection, which may not be ideal for applications needing offline capabilities.
  • Customizability
    There might be limitations on customization compared to running a self-hosted MQTT broker, which offers more control over configurations.
  • Dependency on Internet
    The need for constant internet connectivity could be a drawback for applications in environments with unstable or limited internet access.

NATS features and specs

  • Performance
    NATS is designed for high performance, offering low latency and high throughput, which makes it suitable for real-time applications.
  • Scalability
    It supports horizontal scaling with ease, allowing the system to handle a growing number of connections and messages effectively.
  • Simplicity
    NATS has a straightforward API and simple configuration, making it easier to use and manage compared to more complex messaging systems.
  • Fault Tolerance
    NATS includes features like clustering, message persistence, and support for distributed systems, contributing to high availability and reliability.
  • Polyglot Support
    NATS supports multiple programming languages, including Go, Java, Python, Ruby, and more, making it versatile in various tech stacks.
  • Event-Driven Architecture
    NATS is well-suited for event-driven architecture, facilitating real-time communication and distributed system design.

Possible disadvantages of NATS

  • Limited Message Persistence
    While NATS provides JetStream for message persistence, it was traditionally designed for transient messaging, which might not satisfy all persistence needs.
  • Complex Clustering
    Setting up and maintaining NATS clusters can be complex and may require careful planning and expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    Though simple to start, mastering NATS for large-scale and production-grade deployments can involve a steep learning curve.
  • Feature Set
    NATS focuses on core messaging features, which means it might lack some of the advanced features provided by other messaging systems like Kafka.
  • Ecosystem
    The NATS ecosystem is growing but may not be as extensive as other established messaging systems, potentially limiting available third-party tools and integrations.

CloudMQTT videos

Triggering Sonoff S20 via Amazon Echo and IFTTT/Lambda/CloudMQTT

More videos:

  • Demo - Home Automation Demo: ESP8266 MicroPython, CloudMQTT and IOT MQTT Dashboard android app

NATS videos

The coolest OSS project you've never heard of: NATS Getting started!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CloudMQTT and NATS)
Data Integration
33 33%
67% 67
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0
IoT
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using CloudMQTT and NATS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CloudMQTT and NATS

CloudMQTT Reviews

We have no reviews of CloudMQTT yet.
Be the first one to post

NATS Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
NATS is designed to be simple and easy to use, with a small footprint and low latency. It is often used in cloud-native environments to connect different components of a distributed system or to enable communication between microservices. NATS also supports message persistence, security, and clustering, making it a robust messaging system for building scalable and resilient...
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
One challenge of NATS is that it does not support reliable message queuing out of the box - messages can be lost if a client disconnects before it receives them. This can be mitigated by using NATS Streaming, a data streaming system powered by NATS, but it adds complexity.
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NATS is known for its high performance, low latency, and emphasis on simplicity after it was rewritten in Go. Its rewrite in Go makes NATS an ideal choice for demanding and real-time applications and has increased its throughput compared to its original Ruby implementation.
Source: gcore.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NATS seems to be a lot more popular than CloudMQTT. While we know about 73 links to NATS, we've tracked only 2 mentions of CloudMQTT. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CloudMQTT mentions (2)

  • A beginner's end-to-end project: Raspberry Pi sensor data to dashboard -- I need some general advice getting started
    If it's IoT data, I would first send it to a Cloud MQTT Broker (cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com). These brokers handle the spotty unstable connectivity between themselves and MQTT/IoT devices or clients. Other systems will not handle this instability in connectivity very well. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Connecting to Mqtt broker over GSM or cellular network
    I am trying to make a vehicle tracker, So I am using GPS and Gsm module. I am willing to transfer latlong over cellular network through MQTT to Cloudmqtt.com or any similar. Have anyone done similar project ?, Please help. I tried searching on google.. But all I get is for ESP or NodeMCU. Source: almost 4 years ago

NATS mentions (73)

  • What If We Could Rebuild Kafka from Scratch?
    Https://nats.io is easier to use than Kafka and already solves several of the points in this post I believe, like removing partitions, supporting key-based streams, and having flexible topic hierarchies. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Testing Microservices: Message Isolation for Kafka, SQS, More
    NATS, with its lightweight and high-performance design, offers features well-suited for sandbox testing. We can leverage NATS queue groups, which function similarly to Kafka consumer groups. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Kubernetes on Autopilot: Event-Driven Automation Across Clusters
    In today’s dynamic cloud environments, managing Kubernetes resources across multiple clusters can be a complex task. Traditional methods often lack the agility and event-driven architecture needed to respond quickly to changes and automate resource provisioning. This article explores how Sveltos, in conjunction with NATS and JetStream, simplifies multi-cluster Kubernetes management through event-driven automation,... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • I'll think twice before using GitHub Actions again
    Hey thanks! Definitely interesting! I do wonder if this really solves the author problem because by the looks of it , you just have to run meta command and it would run over each of the sub directory. While at the same time , I think I like it because this is what I think people refer to as "modular monolith" Combining this with nats https://nats.io/ (hey if you don't want it to be over the network , you... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • A Distributed Systems Reading List
    I think it's important to clarify who these lists are really for. They're not meant for people simply looking to "learn distributed systems," in my opinion. These might help those pushing the envelope or looking for new approaches. For the rest of us, imagine asking how to solve quadratic equations and getting 100 papers on category theory. > See also https://ferd.ca/a-distributed-systems-reading-list.html, which... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CloudMQTT and NATS, you can also consider the following products

HiveMQ - HiveMQ is the MQTT based messaging platform for fast, efficient and reliable data movement to and from connected IoT devices and enterprise systems

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

EMQX - EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.

SignalR - SignalR is a server-side software system designed for writing scalable Internet applications, notably web servers.