Software Alternatives & Reviews

ClojureScript VS Inferno

Compare ClojureScript VS Inferno and see what are their differences

ClojureScript logo ClojureScript

A Clojure compiler targeting JavaScript

Inferno logo Inferno

An extremely fast React-like javascript library for building modern user interfaces.
  • ClojureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06
  • Inferno Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

ClojureScript videos

How to use NPM Packages in ClojureScript

More videos:

  • Review - ClojureScript - Chris Houser
  • Review - ClojureScript Release - Rich Hickey

Inferno videos

Inferno - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Inferno - Movie Review
  • Review - Inferno - Official Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ClojureScript and Inferno)
Personal Finance
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Financial Planner
100 100%
0% 0
JavaScript Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ClojureScript and Inferno. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ClojureScript and Inferno

ClojureScript Reviews

We have no reviews of ClojureScript yet.
Be the first one to post

Inferno Reviews

The Best JavaScript Frameworks You’re Not Using
There isn’t an overall number we can use to gauge performance on the chart above, but smaller numbers are better. Obviously, Inferno performs very well again. If you’re a React developer and have a project that requires excellent performance, Inferno is definitely something you should consider. We’ll finish with this from the Inferno “About” page:
Source: jsreport.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ClojureScript should be more popular than Inferno. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ClojureScript mentions (17)

  • jQuery v4.0.0 Beta
    LISP in the browser! You end up having to shit a large runtime with your app but it all transpiles to vanilla JS. https://clojurescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: Why don't browsers just build a non-JS interpreter?
    JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Implement functional programming in Sass
    A few years ago, I started learning the ClojureScript language and quickly became fascinated with functional programming. One day, I wondered if it would be possible to implement a similar programming style in Sass, allowing for anonymous functions and threading macros. After conducting some experiments, I came up with the following Sass functions:. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • HTMX is the future
    I also didn't cheat by transpiling Clojure into JavaScript. (see ClojureScript). - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Which dialect to choose.
    Clojure has also a mature compiler to JavaScript. https://clojurescript.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

Inferno mentions (2)

  • Solid vs React - the Fastest VS the Most Popular UI Library
    Some might argue that React’s relatively poor performance (it’s still plenty-fast for many apps) is due to Virtual DOM and prioritization of development experience, i.e., clarity over complexity. To counter the first argument - there’s React-like Inferno. For the second one - there’s Solid. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • A Look at Compilation in JavaScript Frameworks
    A VDOM library like Inferno uses this information to compile its JSX directly into pre-optimized node structures. Marko, and Vue hoist their static VDOM nodes outside of their components so that they don't incur the overhead of recreating them on every render. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ClojureScript and Inferno, you can also consider the following products

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

Preact.js - Preact is a fast 3kB alternative to React with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.

PureScript - PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript.

Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces