Software Alternatives & Reviews

Clojure VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare Clojure VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Clojure logo Clojure

Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

Steel Bank Common Lisp logo Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.
  • Clojure Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

We recommend LibHunt Clojure for discovery and comparisons of trending Clojure projects.

  • Steel Bank Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-24

Clojure videos

What is the business value of Clojure?

More videos:

  • Review - Blog in Clojure Code Review
  • Review - Clojure Web App Code Review

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Clojure and Steel Bank Common Lisp)
Programming Language
73 73%
27% 27
OOP
73 73%
27% 27
IDE
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Clojure and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clojure should be more popular than Steel Bank Common Lisp. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Clojure mentions (36)

  • Let's write a simple microservice in Clojure
    This article will explain how to write a simple service in Clojure. The sweet spot of making applications in Clojure is that you can expressively use an entire rich Java ecosystem. Less code, less boilerplate: it is possible to achieve more with less. In this example, I use most of the libraries from the Java world; everything else is a thin Clojure wrapper around Java libraries. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • A new F# compiler feature: graph-based type-checking
    I have a tangential question that is related to this cool new feature. Warning: the question I ask comes from a part of my brain that is currently melted due to heavy thinking. Context: I write a fair amount of Clojure, and in Lisps the code itself is a tree. Just like this F# parallel graph type-checker. In Lisps, one would use Macros to perform compile-time computation to accomplish something like this, I think.... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: Why does the Clojure ecosystem feel like such a wasteland?
    As an analogy - my face hasn't changed all that much in a past few years, and I haven't changed my profile picture in those few years. Does it really mean that I'm unmaintained/dead? > Where can I find latest documentation [...]? The answer is still https://clojure.org/. And https://clojuredocs.org/ but it's community-maintained so might occasionally be missing some things right after they're released. E.g. As of... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Best implementation of CL for learning purposes
    As a Java/Scala user you should check out Clojure! It is highly recommended (https://clojure.org). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Why I decided to learn (and teach) Clojure
    Lisp is not a programming language, but a family of languages ​​with many dialects. The most famous dialects include Common Lisp, Clojure, Scheme and Racket. So after deciding that I was going to learn Lisp, I had to choose one of its dialects. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

  • Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
    Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • A few newbie questions about lisp
    Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 11 months ago
  • [C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
    That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
    I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
    > Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Clojure and Steel Bank Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

CLISP - CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.