Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CLISP VS Expresso

Compare CLISP VS Expresso and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

CLISP logo CLISP

CLISP is a portable ANSI Common Lisp implementation and development environment by Bruno Haible.

Expresso logo Expresso

The award-winning Expresso editor is equally suitable as a teaching tool for the beginning user of regular expressions or as a full-featured development environment for the experienced programmer with an extensive knowledge of regular expressions.
  • CLISP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-19
  • Expresso Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

CLISP features and specs

  • Cross-platform compatibility
    CLISP is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, which makes it versatile and accessible for developers across different operating systems.
  • GNU Licensing
    Being licensed under the GNU General Public License, CLISP is free to use, modify, and distribute, which is beneficial for open-source projects and encourages community contributions.
  • Interpreter environment
    CLISP offers an interactive interpreter environment, allowing for rapid testing and prototyping of code, which can speed up development and debugging processes.
  • ANSI Common Lisp compliance
    CLISP adheres to the ANSI Common Lisp standard, ensuring that programs written in CLISP are compliant with the standard and thus more portable and reliable.

Possible disadvantages of CLISP

  • Performance limitations
    Compared to other Lisp implementations like SBCL, CLISP might exhibit slower performance, which can be a drawback for computation-heavy applications.
  • Limited support for external libraries
    CLISP may have limited or less convenient access to certain external libraries or advanced features compared to other implementations, potentially making integration with other systems or technologies more challenging.
  • Outdated documentation
    Some of CLISP's documentation and resources might be outdated, which can pose challenges for new users trying to learn and resolve issues using the available materials.
  • Less active community
    Compared to more popular Lisp systems, CLISP might have a smaller or less active community, which can result in fewer community-contributed resources or slower developments and updates.

Expresso features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Expresso has an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it easy for both novice and experienced users to create and test regular expressions.
  • Comprehensive Test Environment
    It includes a detailed test environment where users can test their regular expressions against sample text to ensure accuracy and efficiency.
  • Integrated Syntax Highlighting
    The tool provides syntax highlighting to help users identify different parts of their expressions easily, which can reduce errors and improve readability.
  • Extensive Library of Expressions
    Expresso features a library of pre-built regular expressions that users can use as a reference or starting point for their own expressions, saving time and effort.
  • Educational Resources
    It offers numerous tutorials and guides that can help users understand regular expressions better and improve their skills progressively.

Possible disadvantages of Expresso

  • Limited to Windows
    Expresso is only available for Windows operating systems, which limits its accessibility to users on other platforms like macOS or Linux.
  • Outdated User Interface
    Some users might find the user interface to be somewhat outdated compared to more modern applications, which could impact the user experience.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    While useful for basic and intermediate tasks, Expresso might lack some advanced features and customization options found in more comprehensive regex tools.
  • No Collaboration Features
    The application does not offer any features for collaboration, which might be a drawback for teams working together on complex projects.
  • No Cloud Integration
    Expresso does not offer cloud integration, meaning users cannot easily sync their work across multiple devices or share it through cloud services.

Analysis of Expresso

Overall verdict

  • Expresso is considered a good tool, especially for beginners and intermediate users who need an intuitive platform to learn and apply regular expressions without getting bogged down by more complex alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Expresso is a popular tool for developing and testing regular expressions. It provides a user-friendly interface, real-time regex testing, and a library of pre-built expressions, making it easier for users to understand and utilize regex for various applications. Its features are particularly useful for those who regularly work with data validation, search and replace operations, and programming tasks involving pattern matching.

Recommended for

  • Beginners learning regular expressions
  • Software developers
  • Data analysts working with text processing
  • Anyone needing a reliable regex testing environment

CLISP videos

+ Add

GNU CLISP - Brief introduction to install and setup of an artificially intelligent environment

Expresso videos

+ Add

REVIEW DE MON EXPRESSO À 100 000 EUROS AVEC STROPOSAUCE

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CLISP and Expresso)

CLISP

Expresso

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Regular Expressions
0 0%
Regular Expressions
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CLISP and Expresso. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Expresso should be more popular than CLISP. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CLISP mentions (1)

  • What are the advantages for an imperative language to not be expression based?
    CLisp is an unfortunate contraction, also naming an implementation, but yes, the Common Lisp spec is that big. Source: over 2 years ago

Expresso mentions (2)

  • Can I match multiple parameters?
    Working in PowerShell (.Net regex) one of my favorite tools is https://ultrapico.com/expresso.htm. It does require registering for a free license but it's well worth it. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Melody - A language that compiles to regular expressions and aims to be more easily readable and maintainable
    Then you need this or something like it: https://ultrapico.com/expresso.htm. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CLISP and Expresso, you can also consider the following products

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

RegExr - RegExr.com is an online tool to learn, build, and test Regular Expressions.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

rubular - A ruby based regular expression editor

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

RegEx Generator - RegEx Generator is a simple-to-use application that comes with the brilliance of intuitive regex and is also helping you out to test the regex.

Loading...