Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ClickHouse VS Materialize

Compare ClickHouse VS Materialize and see what are their differences

ClickHouse logo ClickHouse

ClickHouse is an open-source column-oriented database management system that allows generating analytical data reports in real time.

Materialize logo Materialize

A Streaming Database for Real-Time Applications
  • ClickHouse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-18
  • Materialize Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

ClickHouse features and specs

  • High Performance
    ClickHouse is designed for fast processing of analytical queries, often performing significantly faster than traditional databases due to its columnar storage format and optimized query execution.
  • Scalability
    The system is built to handle extensive datasets by scaling horizontally through distributed cluster configurations, making it suitable for big data applications.
  • Real-time Data Ingestion
    ClickHouse supports real-time data ingestion and can immediately reflect changes in query results, which is valuable for use cases requiring instant data processing and analysis.
  • Cost Efficiency
    The open-source nature of ClickHouse makes it a cost-effective option, especially when compared to other commercial data warehouses.
  • SQL Compatibility
    ClickHouse features strong SQL support, which makes it easier for individuals with SQL expertise to transition and use the platform effectively.
  • Compression
    ClickHouse employs advanced compression algorithms that reduce storage requirements and improve query performance.

Possible disadvantages of ClickHouse

  • Complexity in Setup
    Setting up and managing ClickHouse, particularly in a distributed cluster environment, can be complex and require a higher level of expertise compared to some other database systems.
  • Limited Transaction Support
    ClickHouse is optimized for read-heavy operations and analytics but does not support full ACID transactions, which limits its use for certain transactional use cases.
  • Ecosystem and Tooling
    While the ecosystem is growing, ClickHouse still has fewer tools and third-party integrations compared to more mature databases, which can limit its utility in some environments.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running ClickHouse, especially for large datasets, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU resources.
  • Limited User Management
    The platform has relatively basic user management and security features, which may not meet the needs of enterprises with strict compliance and governance requirements.

Materialize features and specs

  • Real-time Analytics
    Materialize offers real-time stream processing and materialized views, which allow users to get instant results from their data without the need for batch processing. This is particularly useful for applications that require immediate insights.
  • SQL Support
    Materialize supports SQL, making it easy for users familiar with SQL databases to adopt the platform without needing to learn a new language or framework.
  • Consistency
    Materialize maintains strict consistency for its materialized views, ensuring that users always get accurate and up-to-date information from their streams.
  • Integration with Kafka
    It integrates smoothly with Kafka, allowing for easy handling of streaming data and simplifying the process of working with real-time data feeds.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize

  • Scaling Limitations
    Materialize may face challenges when scaling to handle very large data sets compared to some distributed systems designed for big data processing.
  • Limited Language Support
    While SQL is supported, some users may find the lack of alternative query language support limiting, especially if they're accustomed to more expressive query options available in other systems.
  • Complexity in Use Cases
    For more complex use cases involving intricate data transformations or processing, Materialize might require additional configuration and optimization, posing a challenge for less experienced users.
  • Resource Intensive
    The real-time nature of Materialize, especially with maintaining materialized views, can be resource-intensive, potentially leading to higher operational costs.

ClickHouse videos

No ClickHouse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Materialize videos

Bootstrap Vs. Materialize - Which One Should You Choose?

More videos:

  • Review - Materialize Review | Does it compete with Substance Painter?
  • Review - Why We Don't Need Bootstrap, Tailwind or Materialize

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ClickHouse and Materialize)
Databases
76 76%
24% 24
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Database Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Data Warehousing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using ClickHouse and Materialize. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ClickHouse and Materialize

ClickHouse Reviews

Rockset, ClickHouse, Apache Druid, or Apache Pinot? Which is the best database for customer-facing analytics?
ClickHouse is an open-source, column-oriented, distributed, and OLAP database that’s very easy to set up and maintain. “Because it’s columnar, it’s the best architectural approach for aggregations and for ‘sort by’ on more than one column. It also means that group by’s are very fast. It’s distributed, replication is asynchronous, and it’s OLAP—which means it’s meant for...
Source: embeddable.com
ClickHouse vs TimescaleDB
Recently, TimescaleDB published a blog comparing ClickHouse & TimescaleDB using timescale/tsbs, a timeseries benchmarking framework. I have some experience with PostgreSQL and ClickHouse but never got the chance to play with TimescaleDB. Some of the claims about TimescaleDB made in their post are very bold, that made me even more curious. I thought it’d be a great...
20+ MongoDB Alternatives You Should Know About
ClickHouse may be a great contender for moving analytical workloads from MongoDB. Much faster, and with JSON support and Nested Data Structures, it can be great choice for storing and analyzing document data.
Source: www.percona.com

Materialize Reviews

We have no reviews of Materialize yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Materialize might be a bit more popular than ClickHouse. We know about 72 links to it since March 2021 and only 55 links to ClickHouse. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ClickHouse mentions (55)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Twitter's 600-Tweet Daily Limit Crisis: Soaring GCP Costs and the Open Source Fix Elon Musk Ignored
    ClickHouse: ClickHouse is an open-source columnar database management system designed for high-performance analytics. It excels at processing large volumes of data and offers real-time querying capabilities. It’s probably the world’s fastest real-time data analytics system: ClickHouse Benchmark. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • DeepSeek's Data Breach: A Wake-Up Call for AI Data Security
    Further investigation revealed that these ports provided direct access to a publicly exposed ClickHouse database—entirely unprotected and requiring no authentication. This discovery raised immediate security concerns, as ClickHouse is an open-source, columnar database management system designed for high-speed analytical queries on massive datasets. Originally developed by Yandex, ClickHouse is widely used for... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Should You Ditch Spark for DuckDB or Polars?
    Clickhouse also has managed service (https://clickhouse.com/). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • ClickHouse: The Key to Faster Insights
    ClickHouse is rapidly gaining traction for its unmatched speed and efficiency in processing big data. Cloudflare, for example, uses ClickHouse to process millions of rows per second and reduce memory usage by over four times, making it a key player in large-scale analytics. With its advanced features and real-time query performance, ClickHouse is becoming a go-to choice for companies handling massive datasets. In... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

Materialize mentions (72)

  • Category Theory in Programming
    It's hard to write something that is both accessible and well-motivated. The best uses of category theory is when the morphisms are far more exotic than "regular functions". E.g. It would be nice to describe a circuit of live queries (like https://materialize.com/ stuff) with proper caching, joins, etc. Figuring this out is a bit of an open problem. Haskell's standard library's Monad and stuff are watered down to... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Building Databases over a Weekend
    > [...] `https://materialize.com/` to solve their memory issues [...] Disclaimer: I work at Materialize Recently there have been major improvements in Materialize's memory usage as well as using disk to swap out some data. I find it pretty easy to hook up to Postgres/MySQL/Kafka instances: https://materialize.com/blog/materialize-emulator/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Building Databases over a Weekend
    I agree. So many disparate solutions. The streaming sql primitives are by themselves good enough (e.g. `tumble`, `hop` or `session` windows), but the infrastructural components are always rough in real life use cases. Crossing fingers for solutions like `https://github.com/feldera/feldera` to solve their memory issues, or `https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/materialized-view` to solve reliable streaming consumption.... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Drasi: Microsoft's open source data processing platform for event-driven systems
    Or the related Materialize stuff https://materialize.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Rama on Clojure's terms, and the magic of continuation-passing style
    The original post makes so much more sense in this context! One of the "holy grails" in my mind is making CQRS and dataflow programming as easy to learn and maintain as existing imperative programming languages - and easy to weave into real-time UX. There are so many backend endpoints in the wild that do a bunch of things in a loop, many of which will require I/O or calls to slow external endpoints, transform the... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ClickHouse and Materialize, you can also consider the following products

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

RisingWave - RisingWave is a stream processing platform that utilizes SQL to enhance data analysis, offering improved insights on real-time data.

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.

Apache Doris - Apache Doris is an open-source real-time data warehouse for big data analytics.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.