Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

clang VS PCem

Compare clang VS PCem and see what are their differences

clang logo clang

C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

PCem logo PCem

PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...
  • clang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-01
  • PCem Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

clang features and specs

  • High Performance
    Clang is known for its fast compilation time and efficient use of memory, which makes it ideal for large projects that require frequent builds.
  • Modular Design
    The modular design of Clang allows developers to easily integrate it with other tools and projects. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for custom compilers and IDEs.
  • Expressive Diagnostics
    Clang provides highly detailed and easy-to-understand error and warning messages, which help developers quickly identify and fix coding issues.
  • LLVM Infrastructure
    Being a part of the LLVM project, Clang benefits from a robust and active community. It gets frequent updates and improvements, keeping it at the forefront of compiler technology.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Clang supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it a versatile choice for cross-platform development projects.

Possible disadvantages of clang

  • Limited Legacy Support
    Clang may not support some older or obscure language extensions that other compilers, like GCC, might handle. This can be an issue when working with legacy codebases.
  • Evolving Ecosystem
    As part of a rapidly evolving ecosystem, Clang can introduce breaking changes or deprecations that require developers to frequently update their code.
  • Resource Intensive
    Although Clang is efficient, the compilation of very large codebases might require significant system resources, potentially straining less powerful systems.
  • Less Mature in Certain Areas
    Compared to GCC, Clang can be less mature in handling certain language features or optimizations, especially in newer or less common use cases.

PCem features and specs

  • High Compatibility
    PCem is known for its high compatibility with a wide range of older PC systems, allowing users to emulate various hardware configurations from the '80s and '90s.
  • Wide OS Support
    PCem supports a variety of operating systems, allowing users to run DOS, Windows 95, 98, and many other legacy systems.
  • Authentic Experience
    By emulating the hardware at a low level, PCem provides an experience that is very close to using an actual vintage PC.
  • Customization
    Users have extensive control over the configuration of the emulated machine, including CPU type, amount of RAM, and various peripherals.

Possible disadvantages of PCem

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up PCem can be complex, especially for users not familiar with configuring legacy PC hardware and software.
  • Resource Intensive
    PCem can be resource-intensive compared to other emulators, requiring a relatively powerful modern PC to run smoothly.
  • Limited Graphics Support
    While it supports many early graphics cards, PCem lacks support for more advanced graphics emulation beyond older Voodoo models.
  • Requires BIOS
    PCem requires the user to provide their own BIOS files for the emulated systems, which can be difficult to legally obtain.

clang videos

Use Clang on Windows, Linux, and macOS

More videos:

  • Review - The Clang Swordsman
  • Review - CLANG AND BANG: BI'S AND TRI'S FOR DAYS!

PCem videos

Installation and Review of Windows NT 3.1 Build 297 (PCem)

More videos:

  • Review - Emulating Windows 98 (D3D, 3Dfx) on PCEM running 3DMark'99 Full Speed On A Windows 10 PC
  • Demo - Blood II PC Gamer Demo (PCEM Test)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to clang and PCem)
IDE
57 57%
43% 43
Text Editors
54 54%
46% 46
Email Marketing
64 64%
36% 36
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using clang and PCem. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PCem should be more popular than clang. It has been mentiond 34 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

clang mentions (13)

  • dotnet cross-platform interop with C via Environment.ProcessId system call
    I want to compile C program for various operating systems from one machine, that's why on macOS M1 I use zig drop-in replacement compiler (can be used on Linux, Windows too) for cross-platform compilation. There are also clang, gcc (usually pre-installed on macOS and Linux). For Windows there are Visual Studio installer or mingw (which installs gcc). - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • S2S Compilers: Understanding Switch Case Statements
    If you are turning your source code into languages such as C or C++, it is required to have great understanding and knowledge of C/C++. Since these languages also have compilers be it GNU Compiler Collection or Clang, we have to do a lot of digging and researching around their features and functionalities. There is a lot of benefit in that once the target codebase grows and developers start reusing the target... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ready to miss a semi colon and spend the next hour stressing over what went wrong?
    Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Alternatives of MinGW for MacOS
    VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What is the point of free and open source software?
    One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

PCem mentions (34)

  • Popularity of DOS/4GW made Win95 game compat easier, but with higher stakes
    Absolutely check out PCem for a closer to hardware emulation than dosbox, https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Anyone get Sid Meier's SimGolf Working?
    One option is to try PCEm https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ which is a emulator for old computers that runs on Windows and Linux, I actually learned about it via this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9HP9W88Wew of a guy playing Sim Golf on his Windows PC using PCEm, this should be similar on Linux but I'm not sure if the SteamDeck will have enough power but maybe worth a try. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is there anyway to port old abandonware Windows 95/98 game to Apple Silicon?
    For hardcore mode, compile PCEm - I think brew has most of the dependencies available ... https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ - have fun! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is VirtualBox still really bad with Windows 9x?
    You use 86box or PCem which are not virtualizers but hardware emulators so you will need a really fast CPU (especially in single thread). The advantage is that Windows 98 will be running on period appropriate hardware, since all of it is being emulated real-time. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
    QEMU [0] emulates many systems, including the 32-bit Intel architecture. For retro gaming specifically I can recommend PCem [1], which also emulates a wide range of sound and graphics cards, from IBM MDA to 3dfx Voodoo 2. [0] https://www.qemu.org/ [1] https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing clang and PCem, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

NASM - The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

86Box - 86Box is a hypervisor and IBM PC system emulator that specializes in running old operating systems...

PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...

flat assembler - A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.