86Box VS clang

Compare 86Box VS clang and see what are their differences

Setuply

Setuply: Transform Clients into Brand Advocates. An AI-powered, purpose-built platform for client onboarding and lifecycle management, helping B2B teams accelerate revenue recognition, boost retention, and scale operations with confidence. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

86Box

86Box is a hypervisor and IBM PC system emulator that specializes in running old operating systems...

clang

C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Landing page //
2023-10-19

Landing page //
2021-08-01

86Box

Website: github.com

Edit details

clang

Website: clang.llvm.org

Edit details

86Box features and specs

Hardware Emulation
86Box offers comprehensive emulation of various hardware components, allowing users to run a wide range of legacy software and operating systems accurately.
Open Source
Being open-source, 86Box allows users to contribute to its development and customize the emulator to meet specific needs, fostering a community-driven approach.
Active Development
The project is actively maintained and updated, ensuring compatibility with new systems and incorporating user feedback and bug fixes regularly.
Wide Compatibility
It supports a wide range of CPUs, sound cards, and graphics systems, providing flexibility in emulating different historical hardware setups.

Possible disadvantages of 86Box

Complex Setup
Setting up 86Box can be challenging for beginners due to the detailed configuration required for different system components.
Resource Intensive
The emulation can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computer resources to run smoothly, especially for complex setups.
Limited Documentation
While there is community support, official documentation can be sparse, making it difficult for new users to troubleshoot issues independently.
Niche Application
Primarily focused on enthusiasts of retro computing, 86Box may not fulfill the needs of users looking for modern virtualization solutions.

clang features and specs

High Performance
Clang is known for its fast compilation time and efficient use of memory, which makes it ideal for large projects that require frequent builds.
Modular Design
The modular design of Clang allows developers to easily integrate it with other tools and projects. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for custom compilers and IDEs.
Expressive Diagnostics
Clang provides highly detailed and easy-to-understand error and warning messages, which help developers quickly identify and fix coding issues.
LLVM Infrastructure
Being a part of the LLVM project, Clang benefits from a robust and active community. It gets frequent updates and improvements, keeping it at the forefront of compiler technology.
Cross-Platform Support
Clang supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it a versatile choice for cross-platform development projects.

Possible disadvantages of clang

Limited Legacy Support
Clang may not support some older or obscure language extensions that other compilers, like GCC, might handle. This can be an issue when working with legacy codebases.
Evolving Ecosystem
As part of a rapidly evolving ecosystem, Clang can introduce breaking changes or deprecations that require developers to frequently update their code.
Resource Intensive
Although Clang is efficient, the compilation of very large codebases might require significant system resources, potentially straining less powerful systems.
Less Mature in Certain Areas
Compared to GCC, Clang can be less mature in handling certain language features or optimizations, especially in newer or less common use cases.

86Box videos

+ Add

Windows 3.0 30th anniversary special - Installing Windows 3.0 in 86Box

clang videos

+ Add

Use Clang on Windows, Linux, and macOS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to 86Box and clang)

86Box

clang

Text Editors

42 42%

Text Editors

58% 58

IDE

31 31%

IDE

69% 69

Project Management

100 100%

Project Management

0% 0

Email Marketing

0 0%

Email Marketing

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using 86Box and clang. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, clang seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

86Box mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of 86Box yet. Tracking of 86Box recommendations started around Mar 2021.

clang mentions (13)

dotnet cross-platform interop with C via Environment.ProcessId system call
I want to compile C program for various operating systems from one machine, that's why on macOS M1 I use zig drop-in replacement compiler (can be used on Linux, Windows too) for cross-platform compilation. There are also clang, gcc (usually pre-installed on macOS and Linux). For Windows there are Visual Studio installer or mingw (which installs gcc). - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
S2S Compilers: Understanding Switch Case Statements
If you are turning your source code into languages such as C or C++, it is required to have great understanding and knowledge of C/C++. Since these languages also have compilers be it GNU Compiler Collection or Clang, we have to do a lot of digging and researching around their features and functionalities. There is a lot of benefit in that once the target codebase grows and developers start reusing the target... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Ready to miss a semi colon and spend the next hour stressing over what went wrong?
Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 2 years ago
Alternatives of MinGW for MacOS
VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: almost 3 years ago
What is the point of free and open source software?
One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago