Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

clang VS OnlinePHPFunctions

Compare clang VS OnlinePHPFunctions and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

clang logo clang

C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

OnlinePHPFunctions logo OnlinePHPFunctions

OnlinePHPFunctions is a powerful online code tester that lets you add PHP source code and view its output on your favorite web browser.
  • clang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-01
  • OnlinePHPFunctions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-02

clang features and specs

  • High Performance
    Clang is known for its fast compilation time and efficient use of memory, which makes it ideal for large projects that require frequent builds.
  • Modular Design
    The modular design of Clang allows developers to easily integrate it with other tools and projects. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for custom compilers and IDEs.
  • Expressive Diagnostics
    Clang provides highly detailed and easy-to-understand error and warning messages, which help developers quickly identify and fix coding issues.
  • LLVM Infrastructure
    Being a part of the LLVM project, Clang benefits from a robust and active community. It gets frequent updates and improvements, keeping it at the forefront of compiler technology.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Clang supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it a versatile choice for cross-platform development projects.

Possible disadvantages of clang

  • Limited Legacy Support
    Clang may not support some older or obscure language extensions that other compilers, like GCC, might handle. This can be an issue when working with legacy codebases.
  • Evolving Ecosystem
    As part of a rapidly evolving ecosystem, Clang can introduce breaking changes or deprecations that require developers to frequently update their code.
  • Resource Intensive
    Although Clang is efficient, the compilation of very large codebases might require significant system resources, potentially straining less powerful systems.
  • Less Mature in Certain Areas
    Compared to GCC, Clang can be less mature in handling certain language features or optimizations, especially in newer or less common use cases.

OnlinePHPFunctions features and specs

  • Convenience
    OnlinePHPFunctions provides an easy and quick way to test PHP code snippets without needing to set up a local development environment.
  • Accessibility
    Being an online tool, it can be accessed from any device with an internet connection, making it convenient for developers on the go.
  • Cost-effective
    It is typically free to use, allowing users to execute PHP code without purchasing hosting services or setting up local servers.
  • Real-time Feedback
    Users receive immediate feedback on their code executions, which can facilitate learning and rapid prototyping.

Possible disadvantages of OnlinePHPFunctions

  • Limitations on Complexity
    Online platforms often have limitations on the complexity and size of code that can be executed, which can restrict testing of large-scale applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Since code is executed on external servers, there may be concerns regarding the security of the code and the data it processes.
  • Performance
    Internet-based execution may experience latency issues compared to running code locally, which can affect performance testing.
  • Dependency Management
    Handling dependencies and package management is less flexible compared to a local setup, which can limit the scope of testing and development.

clang videos

Use Clang on Windows, Linux, and macOS

More videos:

  • Review - The Clang Swordsman
  • Review - CLANG AND BANG: BI'S AND TRI'S FOR DAYS!

OnlinePHPFunctions videos

No OnlinePHPFunctions videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to clang and OnlinePHPFunctions)
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using clang and OnlinePHPFunctions. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, clang seems to be a lot more popular than OnlinePHPFunctions. While we know about 13 links to clang, we've tracked only 1 mention of OnlinePHPFunctions. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

clang mentions (13)

  • dotnet cross-platform interop with C via Environment.ProcessId system call
    I want to compile C program for various operating systems from one machine, that's why on macOS M1 I use zig drop-in replacement compiler (can be used on Linux, Windows too) for cross-platform compilation. There are also clang, gcc (usually pre-installed on macOS and Linux). For Windows there are Visual Studio installer or mingw (which installs gcc). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • S2S Compilers: Understanding Switch Case Statements
    If you are turning your source code into languages such as C or C++, it is required to have great understanding and knowledge of C/C++. Since these languages also have compilers be it GNU Compiler Collection or Clang, we have to do a lot of digging and researching around their features and functionalities. There is a lot of benefit in that once the target codebase grows and developers start reusing the target... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Ready to miss a semi colon and spend the next hour stressing over what went wrong?
    Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Alternatives of MinGW for MacOS
    VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What is the point of free and open source software?
    One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

OnlinePHPFunctions mentions (1)

  • Problem with eloquent and recursive function
    Also, it would really help if you could give us the data as pretty json instead, format the code as multiline and maybe even put up a sandbox with code and example data? https://sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing clang and OnlinePHPFunctions, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

PHPTester.net - PHPTester.net gives developers and learners the ability to write their PHP code and get the output online.

Tiny C Compiler - The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.

WritePHPOnline.Com - WritePHPOnline.Com is an online site that enables you to write code in PHP and view its output.

PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...

Paiza.io - Paiza.io allows you to write and run code in many languages.