Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

clang VS Documentator

Compare clang VS Documentator and see what are their differences

BoldDesk
Premium Customer Service Software to manage your customer support. Manage support email, publish self-help articles, and automate repetitive tasks. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

clang logo clang

C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Documentator logo Documentator

We make documenting your product a piece of cake 📘
  • clang Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-01
  • Documentator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-13

With Documentator, you’ll never have to worry about assembling a document again. That’s because Documentator helps you through the process from start to finish.

clang

Website
clang.llvm.org
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Documentator

Website
documentator.io
Pricing URL
Official Documentator Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $9.0 / Monthly (Starter)
Platforms
Browser iOS Android Web Google Chrome
Release Date
2020 April
Edit details

clang features and specs

  • High Performance
    Clang is known for its fast compilation time and efficient use of memory, which makes it ideal for large projects that require frequent builds.
  • Modular Design
    The modular design of Clang allows developers to easily integrate it with other tools and projects. This flexibility is particularly beneficial for custom compilers and IDEs.
  • Expressive Diagnostics
    Clang provides highly detailed and easy-to-understand error and warning messages, which help developers quickly identify and fix coding issues.
  • LLVM Infrastructure
    Being a part of the LLVM project, Clang benefits from a robust and active community. It gets frequent updates and improvements, keeping it at the forefront of compiler technology.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Clang supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes it a versatile choice for cross-platform development projects.

Possible disadvantages of clang

  • Limited Legacy Support
    Clang may not support some older or obscure language extensions that other compilers, like GCC, might handle. This can be an issue when working with legacy codebases.
  • Evolving Ecosystem
    As part of a rapidly evolving ecosystem, Clang can introduce breaking changes or deprecations that require developers to frequently update their code.
  • Resource Intensive
    Although Clang is efficient, the compilation of very large codebases might require significant system resources, potentially straining less powerful systems.
  • Less Mature in Certain Areas
    Compared to GCC, Clang can be less mature in handling certain language features or optimizations, especially in newer or less common use cases.

Documentator features and specs

  • Easy to Set-up and use
    Make documenting a piece of cake
  • Beautiful design
    Beautiful crafted designs for you to use

clang videos

+ Add

Use Clang on Windows, Linux, and macOS

More videos:

  • Review - The Clang Swordsman
  • Review - CLANG AND BANG: BI'S AND TRI'S FOR DAYS!

Documentator videos

No Documentator videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to clang and Documentator)

clang

Documentator

IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Documentation
0 0%
Documentation
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Documentation As A Service & Tools
0 0%
Documentation As A Service & Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using clang and Documentator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, clang seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

clang mentions (13)

  • dotnet cross-platform interop with C via Environment.ProcessId system call
    I want to compile C program for various operating systems from one machine, that's why on macOS M1 I use zig drop-in replacement compiler (can be used on Linux, Windows too) for cross-platform compilation. There are also clang, gcc (usually pre-installed on macOS and Linux). For Windows there are Visual Studio installer or mingw (which installs gcc). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • S2S Compilers: Understanding Switch Case Statements
    If you are turning your source code into languages such as C or C++, it is required to have great understanding and knowledge of C/C++. Since these languages also have compilers be it GNU Compiler Collection or Clang, we have to do a lot of digging and researching around their features and functionalities. There is a lot of benefit in that once the target codebase grows and developers start reusing the target... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Ready to miss a semi colon and spend the next hour stressing over what went wrong?
    Clang is an LLVM based C compiler that "allows better diagnostics, better integration with IDEs, a license that is compatible with commercial products, and a nimble compiler that is easy to develop and maintain," compared to other options. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Alternatives of MinGW for MacOS
    VS Code is not an IDE. It's simply an editor without any built-in compiler tools. So you MUST use "other compiler" (and bintools) anyway. As I said, Apple's official C/C++ compiler is LLVM-Clang, which offers even better optimization in some tasks. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What is the point of free and open source software?
    One illustration of this came in 2015 when Stallman decided he Would rather prevent the Gnu Compiler Collection from supporting modern IDE features like symbol completion, than allow GCC front ends to be paired with free-but-not-copyleft backends like LLVM and Clang: "Since LLVM and Clang are not copylefted, they invite nonfree extensions. They are a gaping hole in the defensive wall around our city." Allowing... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

Documentator mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Documentator yet. Tracking of Documentator recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing clang and Documentator, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

Greenboard - Generate beautiful static api documentation

PyCharm - Python & Django IDE with intelligent code completion, on-the-fly error checking, quick-fixes, and much more...

Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites

Tiny C Compiler - The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.

Devhints - TL;DR for developer documentation

Loading...