Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CipherScan VS CryptoLyzer

Compare CipherScan VS CryptoLyzer and see what are their differences

CipherScan logo CipherScan

Cipherscan tests the ordering of the SSL/TLS ciphers on a given target, for all major versions of SSL and TLS.

CryptoLyzer logo CryptoLyzer

Fast and flexible server cryptographic (TLS/SSL) settings analyzer library for Python 2.7/3.4+ with CLI
  • CipherScan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-25
  • CryptoLyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-25

CipherScan features and specs

  • Comprehensive SSL/TLS Analysis
    CipherScan provides a detailed analysis of SSL/TLS configurations, helping users identify supported ciphers and configurations to strengthen security.
  • Open Source
    As an open source tool, CipherScan allows users to freely use, modify, and contribute to its improvement, enhancing transparency and community engagement.
  • Ease of Use
    CipherScan is relatively easy to use with straightforward commands, making it accessible for users with varying levels of experience in cybersecurity.
  • Detailed Output
    The tool provides detailed output, including information on certificate validity and weaknesses in the configuration, aiding in thorough security assessment.

Possible disadvantages of CipherScan

  • Limited to SSL/TLS Analysis
    CipherScan is specialized in analyzing SSL/TLS configurations and does not offer a broader range of cybersecurity assessment features beyond this scope.
  • Potential for Obsolescence
    As an open source tool, CipherScan's development and maintenance depend on community support, which could lead to outdatedness if not actively maintained.
  • Complexity of Output
    While detailed, the output of CipherScan may be overwhelming or complex for users without sufficient technical knowledge in SSL/TLS configurations.
  • Dependency on External Libraries
    CipherScan relies on other libraries and tools for its functionality, which might require additional installation steps and dependencies management.

CryptoLyzer features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    CryptoLyzer provides a detailed analysis of cryptographic materials and configurations, helping to identify strengths and weaknesses in cryptographic implementations.
  • Open Source
    Being open source allows transparency in its operations and the ability for users to contribute to its development or adapt it to their specific needs.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    Supports various protocols and algorithms, enabling users to analyze multiple types of cryptographic environments and configurations.
  • Active Development
    CryptoLyzer is under active development, which means it regularly receives updates and new features, keeping it relevant with the latest cryptographic standards.
  • Community Support
    As part of the open-source community, it benefits from contributions, reviews, and support from other users and developers.

Possible disadvantages of CryptoLyzer

  • Complexity
    The tool may have a steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with cryptographic concepts, making it less accessible to beginners.
  • Limited Documentation
    Documentation might not be exhaustive, potentially requiring users to spend additional time understanding how to effectively use the tool.
  • Resource Intensive
    Performing comprehensive cryptographic analysis can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and time, especially for large-scale assessments.
  • Specialized Use Case
    Designed for cryptographic analysis, it may not be suitable for users looking for a general-purpose security assessment tool.

CipherScan videos

No CipherScan videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CryptoLyzer videos

CyberFM (CYFM) Review #CryptoLyzer

More videos:

  • Review - Celsius (CEL) Review #CryptoLyzer
  • Review - Harmony Network (ONE) Review #CryptoLyzer

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CipherScan and CryptoLyzer)
Web Application Security
49 49%
51% 51
Security
48 48%
52% 52
Cyber Security
49 49%
51% 51
Web And Mobile Application Security

User comments

Share your experience with using CipherScan and CryptoLyzer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CryptoLyzer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CipherScan mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CipherScan yet. Tracking of CipherScan recommendations started around Feb 2022.

CryptoLyzer mentions (1)

  • DHEat Attack
    You can also use CryptoLyzer[1] to audit your TLS (not just HTTPS, but SMTP, IMAP, ...) and SSH servers if you do not want to use SaaS solutions. There are another tools (open source and SaaS) on OWASP Transport Layer Protection Cheat Sheet page[2]. [1] https://gitlab.com/coroner/cryptolyzer. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CipherScan and CryptoLyzer, you can also consider the following products

Qualys SSL Server Test - This free online service performs a deep analysis of the configuration of any SSL web server on the public Internet.

Scanigma - Scanigma offers a comprehensive solution that includes in-depth analysis, evaluation, and reporting of security settings, specific recommendations, sample configurations, and ongoing monitoring.

Mozilla Observatory - The Mozilla Observatory is a project designed to help developers, system administrators, and security professionals configure their sites safely and securely.

Hardenize - Hardenize provides a comprehensive and free assessment of web site network and security configuration.

CryptCheck - CryptCheck is a Ruby toolbox that help anybody to check for cryptography security level and best practices compliance.

Security Headers - Quickly and easily assess the security of your HTTP response headers.