Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cicada.build VS GitlabRunner

Compare Cicada.build VS GitlabRunner and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Cicada.build logo Cicada.build

Build CI/CD pipelines in TypeScript and run them anywhere.

GitlabRunner logo GitlabRunner

Speed up your CI/CD pipeline
  • Cicada.build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • GitlabRunner Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-03-10

Cicada.build features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

GitlabRunner features and specs

  • Integration with GitLab
    GitLab Runner integrates seamlessly with GitLab CI/CD, providing a smooth experience for managing and deploying builds directly from your repositories.
  • Multiple Executor Types
    GitLab Runner supports various executors like Docker, Shell, VirtualBox, Parallels, SSH, and Kubernetes, allowing flexibility in running builds in different environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GitLab Runner allows for complete transparency, the ability to customize or extend functionalities, and does not incur licensing costs.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    GitLab Runner can be installed on multiple platforms, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, offering versatility in build server setup.
  • Autoscaling
    With native support for autoscaling on cloud platforms, GitLab Runner can scale resources up or down, optimizing cost and performance based on demand.

Possible disadvantages of GitlabRunner

  • Complex Setup for Large Projects
    Configuring GitLab Runner for large and complex projects can be challenging, often requiring significant DevOps expertise to optimize the pipeline and runners efficiently.
  • Resource Management
    Managing resources effectively can be complex, especially when dealing with shared runners, which might lead to resource contention or inefficient builds.
  • Limited Community Support
    While GitLab Runner is open source, its community and third-party support might not be as extensive as other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Lack of Plugins
    Compared to other CI/CD systems, GitLab Runner has fewer third-party plugins, which might require custom scripts or workarounds to achieve specific functionalities.
  • Dependency on GitLab
    The tight integration means that GitLab Runner is heavily reliant on GitLab, limiting its use in environments where GitLab is not the primary version control system.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cicada.build and GitlabRunner)

Cicada.build

GitlabRunner

Developer Tools
51 51%
Developer Tools
49% 49
Continuous Integration
43 43%
Continuous Integration
57% 57
Productivity
57 57%
Productivity
43% 43
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Cicada.build and GitlabRunner. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cicada.build and GitlabRunner, you can also consider the following products

SaaS Starter Kit - A starter template with Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD and more

Buddy - The simplest CI/CD tool ever made, acclaimed by top developers worldwide. It uses delivery pipelines to build, test and deploy software. Pipelines are created with over 100 ready-to-use actions, that can be arranged in any way.

Cimon by Cycode - Runtime Security Solution for CI/CD Pipelines

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

R2Devops Hub - Create powerful CI/CD pipelines, easily

Loading...