Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Chrome Extension CLI VS GitHub Actions

Compare Chrome Extension CLI VS GitHub Actions and see what are their differences

Chrome Extension CLI logo Chrome Extension CLI

The CLI for your next Chrome extension 🚀

GitHub Actions logo GitHub Actions

Automate your workflow from idea to production
  • Chrome Extension CLI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29
  • GitHub Actions Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25

Chrome Extension CLI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Chrome Extension CLI simplifies the process of creating Chrome extensions by providing a straightforward command-line interface, making it easier even for beginners.
  • Quick Setup
    It allows users to quickly generate boilerplate code for Chrome extensions, significantly reducing the time needed to set up a new project.
  • Best Practices
    The CLI generates code that follows best practices, thus promoting the development of high-quality and maintainable Chrome extensions.
  • Customization
    Users can tailor the generated code to their specific needs, allowing for greater flexibility in how the extension is developed.
  • Community Support
    Being an open-source project, it benefits from community contributions and support, which can be helpful for troubleshooting and enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Chrome Extension CLI

  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly, new users unfamiliar with CLI tools might require some time to become comfortable using Chrome Extension CLI effectively.
  • Limited Feature Set
    The CLI may not cover every possible feature or scenario needed for complex extensions, requiring developers to manually add custom code.
  • Dependence on Updates
    As an open-source project, its functionality and security depend on regular updates, which may not always align with user timelines or needs.
  • Platform Dependency
    Being tailored specifically for Chrome, it doesn't inherently support extension development for other browsers without modifications.
  • Potential Overhead
    In some cases, the generated boilerplate might include unnecessary code, adding overhead which developers need to trim.

GitHub Actions features and specs

  • Seamless GitHub Integration
    GitHub Actions are natively integrated with GitHub, making it easy to use within repositories and leverage other GitHub features such as issues, pull requests, and releases.
  • Custom Workflows
    Allows for the creation of complex and custom workflows using YAML syntax, providing flexibility to handle a variety of CI/CD processes.
  • Marketplace Access
    Access to GitHub Marketplace where a wide range of pre-built actions are available, allowing users to quickly set up workflows with minimal configuration.
  • Concurrent Execution
    Supports parallel execution of jobs, which can significantly reduce the time needed to run workflows by performing multiple tasks simultaneously.
  • Self-Hosted Runners
    Provides the ability to use self-hosted runners, offering more control over the environment and resources used for running workflows.
  • Cost-Efficient
    Includes a generous free tier, especially for public repositories, which can be cost-effective for projects with limited resource requirements.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Actions

  • Complexity for Beginners
    Due to its powerful features and flexibility, setting up and managing GitHub Actions can be complex for users who are not familiar with CI/CD processes or YAML.
  • Limited to GitHub
    As a GitHub-specific product, GitHub Actions is tied to repositories hosted on GitHub, limiting its use for projects that are hosted on other version control platforms.
  • Billing for Additional Usage
    While there is a free tier, usage beyond the free limits incurs additional charges, which can become significant for high-frequency or resource-intensive workflows.
  • Resource Limitations
    GitHub Actions has limitations on available resources (such as CPU and memory) for runners, which can be restrictive for very resource-intensive tasks.

Analysis of GitHub Actions

Overall verdict

  • GitHub Actions is considered a good option for teams looking for seamless integration with GitHub and those who value its versatility and ease of setup. Its feature-rich environment and flexibility make it a strong choice for automation workflows.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub Actions is a CI/CD tool that allows developers to automate their workflows directly from the GitHub repository, making it highly convenient for teams already using GitHub for version control. It supports a wide range of triggers and actions, integrates well with other GitHub features, and offers a large marketplace of community-created actions to extend functionality. Continuous updates and active community support enhance its utility and effectiveness.

Recommended for

  • Teams already using GitHub for their projects.
  • Developers looking for an easy setup and maintenance of CI/CD pipelines.
  • Projects of all sizes that require automation of workflows.
  • Organizations that value continuous integration and deployment with minimal configuration.

Chrome Extension CLI videos

No Chrome Extension CLI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

GitHub Actions videos

5 Ways to DevOps-ify your App - Github Actions Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Introducing GitHub Package Registry
  • Review - Automatic Deployment With Github Actions
  • Review - GitHub Actions - Now with built-in CI/CD! Live from GitHub HQ

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Chrome Extension CLI and GitHub Actions)
Developer Tools
10 10%
90% 90
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Chrome Extension CLI and GitHub Actions. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Chrome Extension CLI and GitHub Actions

Chrome Extension CLI Reviews

We have no reviews of Chrome Extension CLI yet.
Be the first one to post

GitHub Actions Reviews

Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
GitHub Actions is the CI/CD solution that’s built into GitHub, the most popular version control platform. It’s specifically designed to provide an intuitive experience for developers who want to run pipelines quickly without having to configure any separate software. Because it’s a managed SaaS service that’s specifically focused on CI/CD, there are no self-hosting...
Source: spacelift.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Actions seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 307 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Chrome Extension CLI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Chrome Extension CLI yet. Tracking of Chrome Extension CLI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GitHub Actions mentions (307)

  • What tools can help streamline cloud deployment processes?
    If your code lives on GitHub (which it probably does), GitHub Actions should be your go-to for CI/CD. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Getting started with FrankenPHP, Laravel and Docker
    My base target is used for development use, but my production target is used for production use. I'm using a GitHub Actions workflow to checkout my code, installing dependencies without development dependencies, and building my application. When that's done, I build the Docker image and send it to my container registry. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Automating Voicebot Deployments for Amazon Connect
    In this post, I will share WebRTC.ventures' best practices in automating the deployment of AI-powered voice assistants for Amazon Connect, moving beyond manual, click-by-click setups to a robust, scalable Infrastructure as Code (IaC) approach. We’ll explore how to manage both static and dynamic resources, leverage tools like Terraform and AWS Serverless Application Model (SAM), and even set up an automated... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Deploying a static Website with Pulumi
    The Python Pulumi code is deployed with GitHub Actions. This leverages static credentials for AWS embedded as repository secrets. I have implemented two workflows:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • As Visual Studio App Center closes, a look back, and what to use now?
    When Microsoft announced the App Center shutdown last year, they recommended an array of alternative tools from elsewhere in their developer toolkit and beyond to replace its capabilities. Users seeking an alternative to App Center's hosted build automation, or App Store deployment, capabilities can look to Azure DevOps Pipelines or GitHub Actions. For cloud-based on-device testing, they recommend external tool... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Chrome Extension CLI and GitHub Actions, you can also consider the following products

Project Idea CLI - Find project ideas easily

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

NoCode.tech - Free tools & resources for non-tech makers and entrepreneurs

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Medium CLI - A command line Interface for reading Medium stories

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development