Software Alternatives & Reviews

Chef Habitat VS AppImageKit

Compare Chef Habitat VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

Chef Habitat logo Chef Habitat

Chef Habitat - Automation that travels with the app. Chef Habitat allows any app to be independent of any particular infrastructure environment, like containers or PaaS.

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • Chef Habitat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

Chef Habitat videos

ChefConf 2019: A Guided Tour of Chef Habitat Builder and Depot

More videos:

  • Review - dotNET Dev Show: Beyond the Basics with Chef Habitat

AppImageKit videos

No AppImageKit videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Chef Habitat and AppImageKit)
Developer Tools
20 20%
80% 80
Front End Package Manager
Containers As A Service
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Chef Habitat and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Chef Habitat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Chef Habitat yet. Tracking of Chef Habitat recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AppImageKit mentions (52)

  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the best CLI installation experience you've ever seen?
    There is AppImage[1], which packs a lot of stuff into a SquashFS filesystem, appends it to the executable, so everything is in one file. [1] https://appimage.org. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Linux users when their preferred app isn't packaged in the main repository
    Nah I think yall just hating appimage. Real gold standard. Source: 10 months ago
  • How to minimize RAM usage during Go binary compilation
    Although I haven't used plugins feature myself yet, this does sound like the perfect use case for them. Not every patient needs to access every single source. With plugins you can load only the source (or few sources) that they actually need. You can still use something like https://appimage.org/ to give them "a single binary", but will actually contain your slim binary and all the plugins. Source: 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Chef Habitat and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

Kublr - Kublr offers enterprise-grade secure, scalable, highly reliable Kubernetes clusters on AWS, Azure...

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.