It's called https://leaningtech.com/cheerp/. Source: almost 3 years ago

It then creates an adapter function that calls the original and pass more (or less) arguments to it with default values, and returns that function address instead of the original bitcasted one. This is not a perfect solution, because in theory one can store the pointer and convert it to a different type later, but in the case of python C extensions this is sufficient to fix the issue (at least in my experiments),... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

The compiler looks to be here: https://github.com/rui314/8cc. Source: over 2 years ago

Yes, C can be simple for writing a compiler. [0][1] No, optimisation, on the other hand, is not a simple problem. [0] https://github.com/rui314/8cc [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Implement a compiler for a subset of C. This doesn't need to be self-hosting, but bonus points if it is. Here's an example of what it can look like: https://github.com/rui314/8cc. Source: almost 4 years ago

While this is an impressive work, I feel that there are a lot of "tiny" C compilers out there; how is yours any different than SmallerC, TinyC, 8cc, chibicc and many others? Source: about 4 years ago

Great question. Here are some candidates: * https://github.com/rswier/c4 * https://github.com/Fedjmike/mini-c * https://github.com/rui314/8cc * https://github.com/rui314/chibicc * https://github.com/aligrudi/neatcc Some of them are actually interpreters, and I personally would be interested in actual compilers that generate machine code. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago