Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Charles Proxy VS WebSite-Watcher

Compare Charles Proxy VS WebSite-Watcher and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

WebSite-Watcher logo WebSite-Watcher

WebSite-Watcher detects website updates and highlights all changes in the text. WebSite-Watcher monitors web pages, password protected pages, disucssion forums and much more.
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • WebSite-Watcher Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-12

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

WebSite-Watcher features and specs

  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    WebSite-Watcher allows you to monitor websites for changes comprehensively, including content updates, new posts, and changes in specific sections.
  • Customization
    The tool offers a high degree of customization, allowing users to set specific criteria for monitoring, such as keywords, frequency of checks, and types of changes to track.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    WebSite-Watcher supports a variety of platforms, including Windows, and also offers mobile alerts, making it highly versatile.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software features a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for both novices and advanced users to configure and manage their website monitoring tasks.
  • Automation
    The tool supports automation through scripts and macros, enabling advanced users to automate complex monitoring tasks and integrate WebSite-Watcher into their workflows.

Possible disadvantages of WebSite-Watcher

  • Cost
    WebSite-Watcher is a paid software, and while it offers a free trial, the full version may be considered expensive for individual users or small businesses.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and customization options, there might be a steep learning curve, particularly for users who are new to website monitoring tools.
  • Windows-Centric
    The software is primarily designed for Windows, which may limit accessibility for users on other operating systems like macOS or Linux.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running WebSite-Watcher continuously can be resource-intensive, which might affect the performance of lower-end computers.
  • Limited Mobile Functionality
    While mobile alerts are supported, the overall functionality and user experience on mobile devices are limited compared to the desktop version.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Charles Proxy and WebSite-Watcher)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Uptime Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Charles Proxy and WebSite-Watcher. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Charles Proxy and WebSite-Watcher

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

WebSite-Watcher Reviews

We have no reviews of WebSite-Watcher yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Charles Proxy and WebSite-Watcher, you can also consider the following products

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Visualping - Visualping is the easiest to use website checker, webpage change monitoring, website change detector and website change alert software of the web. Read more about Visualping.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Distill Web Monitor - Distill is a web monitoring tool. It can monitor RSS feeds, a webpage or a part of webpage. Alerts in the form of pop-up, audio or emails can be received.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Wachete - Track web page changes and get notified. Free Sign-up. Have all data in one place