Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Charles Proxy VS Terminalizer

Compare Charles Proxy VS Terminalizer and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Terminalizer logo Terminalizer

Terminalizer is a dynamic platform that offers you to record your terminal in a better and instant way.
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • Terminalizer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-09

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Terminalizer features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Terminalizer is compatible with multiple operating systems including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, allowing users from different platforms to create terminal recordings.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize the appearance of their terminal recordings with themes, fonts, and colors, offering flexibility in presentation.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Terminalizer allows users to modify and improve the source code according to their needs, fostering a collaborative development environment.
  • High-Quality Outputs
    Terminalizer allows users to produce high-quality GIFs and videos that are suitable for professional presentations or tutorials.
  • Advanced Features
    Includes advanced features such as frame-by-frame editing and the ability to control the speed of playback, offering detailed control over the recording output.

Possible disadvantages of Terminalizer

  • Resource Intensive
    Capturing terminal sessions and generating output can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down systems with limited hardware capabilities.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Users might find the initial setup and advanced features challenging to understand, particularly if they are not familiar with terminal operations.
  • Limited Output Formats
    Primarily outputs recordings in GIF format, which might not be suitable for all use cases that demand different video formats.
  • Dependency on Node.js
    Requires Node.js to be installed, which may add complexity for users who do not have it set up in their environment.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Charles Proxy and Terminalizer)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Charles Proxy and Terminalizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Charles Proxy and Terminalizer

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Terminalizer Reviews

We have no reviews of Terminalizer yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Terminalizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Charles Proxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Charles Proxy yet. Tracking of Charles Proxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Terminalizer mentions (1)

  • Terminalizer: Record your terminal and generate animated gif images or share a web player
    I have just stumbled upon it and seems very easy to use - https://terminalizer.com/ Just did a quick test on my FISH shell and it works like a charm. Has anyone tried it and do you have any other alternative to suggest? - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Charles Proxy and Terminalizer, you can also consider the following products

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

asciinema - Record and share your terminal sessions, the right way. Forget screen recording apps and blurry video. Enjoy a lightweight, purely text-based approach to terminal recording.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Teleconsole - Teleconsole is a free service to share your terminal session with people you trust.

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

tmate - Tmate is a instant terminal sharing based on ssh.