Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
CRC

Charles Proxy VS Cocoa Rest Client

Compare Charles Proxy VS Cocoa Rest Client and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Cocoa Rest Client logo Cocoa Rest Client

A free open source, native Apple OS X app for testing HTTP/REST endpoints
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • Cocoa Rest Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-08-23

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Cocoa Rest Client features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Charles Proxy and Cocoa Rest Client)

Charles Proxy

Cocoa Rest Client

Developer Tools
90 90%
Developer Tools
10% 10
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
Proxy
0% 0
Security
100 100%
Security
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Charles Proxy and Cocoa Rest Client. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Charles Proxy and Cocoa Rest Client

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
Source: www.bestproxyreviews.com
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Cocoa Rest Client Reviews

We have no reviews of Cocoa Rest Client yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Charles Proxy and Cocoa Rest Client, you can also consider the following products

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

gURL - gURL is a free, Open Source (GPL) HTTP request generator tool.

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Hurl.it - Hurl makes HTTP requests.

Loading...