Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Charles Proxy VS Cellist

Compare Charles Proxy VS Cellist and see what are their differences

Charles Proxy logo Charles Proxy

HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Cellist logo Cellist

Cellist is an all-in-one HTTP debugging proxy software designed for OS that provides a straightforward approach to put a proxy between the HTTP client and the internet.
  • Charles Proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20
  • Cellist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

Charles Proxy features and specs

  • Comprehensive HTTP/HTTPS Debugging
    Charles Proxy offers robust capabilities to inspect HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it easier for developers to debug and optimize network requests.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool has an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which makes it accessible for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Various Platforms
    Charles Proxy is available on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, enhancing its accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Throttling Feature
    It allows users to simulate different internet speeds, latency, and bandwidth conditions, which is useful for testing applications under various network scenarios.
  • SSL Proxying
    Charles can decrypt SSL traffic, which is crucial for developers to inspect secure web traffic in development and testing phases.
  • Session Recording and Exporting
    It allows users to record network sessions and export them to share or analyze later, facilitating team collaboration and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Charles Proxy

  • Cost
    Charles Proxy is a paid tool. While it offers a trial version, a license must be purchased for continued use, which could be a limitation for some users or small teams with restricted budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Although the interface is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities have a steep learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with network debugging.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Charles Proxy can be resource-intensive on your system, potentially slowing down performance, especially when monitoring large amounts of traffic.
  • Manual Configuration
    Users need to manually configure their devices or browsers to route through Charles Proxy, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
  • Limited Automation Capabilities
    Charles Proxy has limited support for automation compared to other modern debugging tools, which may affect its suitability for automated testing workflows.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There may be compatibility issues with certain applications or devices, particularly those with strict security measures against proxying, which can impede testing efforts.

Cellist features and specs

  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    Cellist offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of monitoring HTTP and HTTPS traffic, making it accessible even for beginners.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The software is designed to work seamlessly on macOS, ensuring that users on Apple's ecosystem can utilize its features without compatibility issues.
  • Comprehensive Debugging
    Cellist provides detailed insights into network traffic, which aids developers in identifying and resolving bugs more efficiently.
  • Flexible Filtering Options
    Users can filter traffic based on various criteria, allowing them to focus on specific requests or responses that are of interest.
  • Free to Use
    The software is freeware, meaning users can benefit from its capabilities without any cost involved.

Possible disadvantages of Cellist

  • Mac-Only Availability
    Cellist is only available for macOS, limiting its use for users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While sufficient for basic monitoring, Cellist lacks some of the more advanced features that power users might find in other paid solutions.
  • Potential Performance Issues
    On some systems, the software might cause performance slowdowns, especially if monitoring large volumes of data.
  • Dependency on System Configurations
    Effective functioning might require specific configurations or adjustments on some systems, which could be cumbersome for less tech-savvy users.
  • Security Concerns
    Monitoring HTTPS traffic requires decrypting it, which, if not managed correctly, could pose a security risk regarding sensitive data exposure.

Charles Proxy videos

No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cellist videos

Professional vs Beginner Cellist

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Charles Proxy and Cellist)
Developer Tools
73 73%
27% 27
Proxy
56 56%
44% 44
Security
83 83%
17% 17
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Charles Proxy and Cellist. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Charles Proxy and Cellist

Charles Proxy Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run correctly is agreeable with all OS, web browsers, any smart devices, personal computers, and internet applications.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for beginners. While Charles Proxy has a more approachable interface compared to Wireshark, it might seem cluttered to some users. Fiddler’s UI is information-rich and...
Source: dev.to

Cellist Reviews

We have no reviews of Cellist yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Charles Proxy and Cellist, you can also consider the following products

Fiddler - Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.

Surge for Mac - Advanced Web Debugging Proxy for Mac & iOS

Proxyman.io - Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Weer - A HTTP protocol debugger with Chrome DevTools frontend interface

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

James - James is a HTTP Proxy and Monitor that enables developers to view and intercept requests made from...