Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Celluloid VS PingPong UX

Compare Celluloid VS PingPong UX and see what are their differences

LiveSession
LiveSession helps you analyze users’ behavior, improve UX, find JS bugs, and increase conversion rates using session replays, and event-based product analytics. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Celluloid logo Celluloid

Celluloid (formerly GNOME MPV) is a simple GTK+ frontend for mpv. Celluloid interacts with mpv via the client API exported by libmpv, allowing access to mpv's powerful playback capabilities.

PingPong UX logo PingPong UX

The easiest way to run remote user research. Test your product with users worldwide & create experiences they'll love.
  • Celluloid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-22
  • PingPong UX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-28

Celluloid videos

+ Add

Celluloid (2013) - Movie Review | Prithviraj Sukumaran | Malayalam Cinema History

More videos:

  • Review - Platinum 3776 Celluloid fountain pen review!

PingPong UX videos

No PingPong UX videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Celluloid and PingPong UX)

Celluloid

PingPong UX

Audio Player
100 100%
Audio Player
0% 0
User Experience
0 0%
User Experience
100% 100
Media Player
100 100%
Media Player
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Celluloid and PingPong UX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Celluloid seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Celluloid mentions (11)

  • What is KDE Dragon Player based on? (The video player)
    Personally I use the mpv-amd-full-git package with the Celluloid fronted. Haruna works fine but it loses some functionality compared to Celluloid, like adding an external audio to a movie. Haruna is far superior in terms of front-end design. Source: about 1 year ago
  • VLC has the best feature of ANY video player IMO
    Then there is still no GUI. SMPlayer, Celluloid, etc. wouldn't exist if there was a GUI already. Source: over 1 year ago
  • VLC Stuttering after unpause?
    For those who don't know, Celluloid (which ships with mint) is just a better (imo) frontend for MPV. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Any audio player with playback speed control?
    Both VLC and MPV frontends like Celluloid give you keyboard control over playback speed. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Mpv – a free, open-source, and cross-platform media player
    There are GUIs based on mpv that provide a user-friendly interface and just use mpv for playback, see Celluloid [0]. [0]: https://celluloid-player.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

PingPong UX mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PingPong UX yet. Tracking of PingPong UX recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Celluloid and PingPong UX, you can also consider the following products

MPV - MPV is an audio and movie player based on MPlayer and mplayer2.

Dovetail - Mobile Cloud-Based Dental Software

VLC Media Player - VLC is a free and open source cross-platform multimedia player and framework.

Slack - A messaging app for teams who see through the Earth!

SMPlayer - SMPlayer is a free video and audio player for both Windows and Linux that allows you to play almost all media files without having to install additional codecs. Read more about SMPlayer.

Lookback - See how people really use your app

Loading...