Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

CCProxy VS memcached

Compare CCProxy VS memcached and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

CCProxy logo CCProxy

Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system
  • CCProxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

CCProxy features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    CCProxy offers an intuitive user interface that simplifies the process of setting up and configuring proxy servers, making it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Multi-Protocol Support
    The software supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more, allowing it to cater to diverse networking needs.
  • User Management
    CCProxy provides robust user management features, enabling administrators to efficiently control and monitor user activities and bandwidth usage.
  • Access Control
    It includes access control functionalities that allow admins to block unwanted sites and set internet access restrictions based on IP addresses or domains.
  • Cache Management
    The software offers effective caching mechanisms to improve internet browsing speed and reduce bandwidth consumption by storing frequently accessed data.

Possible disadvantages of CCProxy

  • Windows Only
    CCProxy is only compatible with Windows operating systems, which could be a limitation for users who operate on macOS or Linux platforms.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of CCProxy has restricted functionalities, encouraging users to purchase the full version for comprehensive features.
  • Scalability Issues
    For larger enterprises, CCProxy might lack the advanced scalability features that are necessary to efficiently handle large volumes of traffic.
  • Basic Reporting
    The reporting and analytics features are relatively basic, which might not meet the requirements of organizations seeking in-depth network analysis.
  • Customer Support
    The availability and responsiveness of technical support could be improved to provide faster assistance for troubleshooting and user queries.

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

CCProxy videos

Let's have a look at CCProxy

More videos:

  • Review - instalar ccproxy y configurarlo
  • Tutorial - how to install ccproxy . bitvise ssh client . proxifier fake ip

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CCProxy and memcached)
Proxy Server
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CCProxy and memcached. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CCProxy and memcached

CCProxy Reviews

  1. Massimo tompaselli
    The best for small office with 25 computers .

    Complete , simple and powerfull , all option for band control included ! But free for only 3 user . I have not found better 20' min for reading instruction, installing and setup for non expert , (3' min for expert ) !

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I don’t see “some” of the other offering out there like MemCached… what was the criteria used to select these? I don’t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storage Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 36 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CCProxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CCProxy yet. Tracking of CCProxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

memcached mentions (36)

  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached — Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • story of upgrading rails 5.x to 7.x
    The app depends on several packages to run, so I need to install them locally too. I used a combination of brew and orbstack / docker for installing packages. Some dependencies for this project are redis, mongodb and memcache. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CCProxy and memcached, you can also consider the following products

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

3proxy - 3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

FreeProxy - Feature summary from website:* Internet connection sharing with demand dialling

Aerospike - Aerospike is a high-performing NoSQL database supporting high transaction volumes with low latency.