Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Castup VS Audio Hijack

Compare Castup VS Audio Hijack and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Castup logo Castup

Professional podcast editing from 40¢ per published minute

Audio Hijack logo Audio Hijack

Record any audio, with Audio Hijack!
  • Castup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • Audio Hijack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-13

Castup videos

No Castup videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Audio Hijack videos

+ Add

How I Use Audio Hijack (Review)

More videos:

  • Review - How I Record Podcasts with Audio Hijack
  • Review - Audio Hijack 3 Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Castup and Audio Hijack)

Castup

Audio Hijack

Podcast Tools
61 61%
Podcast Tools
39% 39
Audio
0 0%
Audio
100% 100
Podcast Hosting
100 100%
Podcast Hosting
0% 0
Audio & Music
0 0%
Audio & Music
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Castup and Audio Hijack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Audio Hijack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 63 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Castup mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Castup yet. Tracking of Castup recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Audio Hijack mentions (63)

  • EQ Mac audio INPUT?
    This is the basic idea, but there are other apps which can make it easier. I prefer using Audio Hijack for the EQ part and sending it to a pass-through device set up in Loopback (which, for this use case, functions the same as BlackHole). Source: 7 months ago
  • Upgrading my gear, need some advice for recording multiple people
    - Audio Hijack (also by Rogue Ameba) so I can record myself, the soundboard, and QuickTime all to individual .aiff files. Source: 10 months ago
  • Why does Mac doesn't record internal audio?
    Another option that has been around for a long time. https://rogueamoeba.com/audiohijack/. Source: 11 months ago
  • MacOS Audio API
    Definitely doable though might point to Rogue Amoeba re: implementation/execution particularly: SoundSource, Loopback & Audio Hijack. Source: 12 months ago
  • recording audio issue
    If you want to record application-specific audio (like from a game but not from Spotify) then it’s more complicated. Audio Hijack is a good app for this: https://rogueamoeba.com/audiohijack/. Source: 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Castup and Audio Hijack, you can also consider the following products

AdBarker - Dynamic ad insertion service for your podcast

Loopback by RogueAmoeba - Get all the power of a high-end studio mixing board, right inside your Mac!

Brew.com - A new way for podcasters to monetize their content 🎙💰

Audacity - Audacity is a free and open-source audio production software suite that includes a surprising array of editing tools and recording systems.

Anchor.fm - Record bite-sized podcasts that anyone can join ⚓

Adobe Audition - Mix, edit, and create audio content in Adobe Audition CC with a comprehensive toolset that includes multitrack, waveform, and spectral display.

Loading...