Software Alternatives & Reviews

Canonical LXD VS Turbo

Compare Canonical LXD VS Turbo and see what are their differences

Canonical LXD logo Canonical LXD

Canonical LXD vs Docker: Which is better? We compared these products and thousands more to help professionals like you find the perfect solution for your business. Let IT Central Station and our comparison database help you with your research.

Turbo logo Turbo

Turbo.net applications run instantly on all your desktops, mobile devices, and the cloud.
  • Canonical LXD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • Turbo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

Canonical LXD videos

No Canonical LXD videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Turbo videos

You DON'T Remember Turbo

More videos:

  • Review - Turbo movie review
  • Review - Turbo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Canonical LXD and Turbo)
Containers As A Service
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
VPS
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Canonical LXD and Turbo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Turbo seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Canonical LXD mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Canonical LXD yet. Tracking of Canonical LXD recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Turbo mentions (4)

  • Companies deliberately make your job difficult and life hard
    Most of the tools used for packaging applications into standalone portable versions require 3 steps: 1) a snapshot of the current system, 2) installation of the new application, and 3) another snapshot of the system to compare differences. That's the case for Cameyo, or for VMware ThinApp, or turbo.net Studio (formerly Spoon, formerly Xenocode from more than a decade ago). That approach is not going to work for... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Edge or Chrome Browser?
    You can also create portable apps that attempt to isolate attacks. Https://turbo.net/ These are also virtualized, but have the advantage that you can copy it to any usb drive and run the apps on most PCs without needing to install. E.g. You can take your browser with your bookmarks and your Microsoft Office with you and use it in PCs that don't have either. No install needed. Source: over 2 years ago
  • REDEPLOYED / transferred entire image from one Book3 to a replacement Book3 - Worked
    But easier ways include using virtual machines ( just copy the vm files and run them on any other pc ), and portable apps ( https://turbo.net/ or https://www.vmware.com/products/thinapp.html , no need to install configured apps on another pc, just copy and run ). Source: over 2 years ago
  • How to get free RDP
    Go to: Https://turbo.net/ Now Register an account: Select Program you want to use (Preferably Google Chrome) Enjoy Free RDP! Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Canonical LXD and Turbo, you can also consider the following products

Apache Mesos - Apache Mesos abstracts resources away from machines, enabling fault-tolerant and elastic distributed systems to easily be built and run effectively.

CentminMod - Centmin Mod is a LEMP stack shell menu based auto installer.

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

VPSSIM - VPSSIM provides installer enabling users to install LEMP stack on their servers.

runc - CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc

Pilvi - Your Software Sales, Automated Pilvi™ is the e-Commerce platform for online SaaS sales automation Pilvi™ FREE